Re: [squid-users] Sha 256?

On 12/12/2015 6:05 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 12/12/2015 10:55 a.m., George Hollingshead wrote: >> i am getting this message when trying to run my newly compiled squid >> 3.5.11. i think it's related to openssl but i'm really lost. >> >> Any incite on what's needed to correct this? i'm reall

Re: [squid-users] Sha 256?

On 12/12/2015 10:55 a.m., George Hollingshead wrote: > i am getting this message when trying to run my newly compiled squid > 3.5.11. i think it's related to openssl but i'm really lost. > > Any incite on what's needed to correct this? i'm really determined to bump > ssl so i can log them but it

Re: [squid-users] Help with basic config for ssl bump

On 12/12/2015 7:48 a.m., Yuri Voinov wrote: > > http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/SslBumpExplicit > > Feel free to read our good Wiki. > > 12.12.15 0:46, George Hollingshead пишет: >> Can any of you help a newb out here. I'm upgradihng from 3.0 to 3.5 so i >> can see https co

Re: [squid-users] reverse proxy setup

On 12/12/2015 4:07 p.m., Alex Samad wrote: > Hi > > I'm thinking it is outlook not being able to talk tls1.1 and/or tls > 1.2 to squid. I am in the process of patching up my test box. > > By ignoring that, I mean the reason its there is that outlook tried to > talk tls1 to it whilst I had tls1 tu

Re: [squid-users] Fw: Squid 32-bit (2.7.2) much faster than

On 12/12/2015 7:42 a.m., Patrick Flaherty wrote: > Hello, > > I added the following line to my squid.conf and now Squid 3.5.11 is as fast > as 2.7.2 and feels like direct internet access. > > dns_v4_first on > That plus the huge difference in speed tells me that you have very broken IPv6 conn

Re: [squid-users] Squid with NTLM auth behind netscaler

On 12/12/2015 3:42 a.m., Fabio Bucci wrote: > Thank Amos i know you suggested kerberos. How can i implement it instead of > LDAP? Amos ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.sq

Re: [squid-users] reverse proxy setup

Hi I'm thinking it is outlook not being able to talk tls1.1 and/or tls 1.2 to squid. I am in the process of patching up my test box. By ignoring that, I mean the reason its there is that outlook tried to talk tls1 to it whilst I had tls1 turned off A On 11 December 2015 at 15:50, Amos Jeffries

[squid-users] Sha 256?

i am getting this message when trying to run my newly compiled squid 3.5.11. i think it's related to openssl but i'm really lost. Any incite on what's needed to correct this? i'm really determined to bump ssl so i can log them but it's becoming a pain for my skill level; lol Thanx FATAL: sign

Re: [squid-users] Help with basic config for ssl bump

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/SslBumpExplicit Feel free to read our good Wiki. 12.12.15 0:46, George Hollingshead пишет: > Can any of you help a newb out here. I'm upgradihng from 3.0 to 3.5 so i > can see https connects a

[squid-users] Help with basic config for ssl bump

Can any of you help a newb out here. I'm upgradihng from 3.0 to 3.5 so i can see https connects and i'm a little confused as to what i need to add to my working config for SSL bump i have certificates generated just a basic squid.conf of what i need to add to get SSL bump so i can log https conn

Re: [squid-users] Fw: Squid 32-bit (2.7.2) much faster than

Hello, I added the following line to my squid.conf and now Squid 3.5.11 is as fast as 2.7.2 and feels like direct internet access. dns_v4_first on Thank You, Patrick Message: 3 Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 02:47:05 +1300 From: Amos Jeffries To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org Subject: Re: [squi

Re: [squid-users] Squid 32-bit (2.7.2) much faster than Squid 64-bit (3.5.11)

I believe one possible issue is here: max_filedescriptors 3200 Need to have squid and the OS working together, adding it to squid without the proper setting in the OS causes delays and slow performance. I would suggest commenting this out and restarting the squid service to see if that helps.

Re: [squid-users] Squid with NTLM auth behind netscaler

Thank Amos i know you suggested kerberos. How can i implement it instead of LDAP? 2015-12-11 15:39 GMT+01:00 Amos Jeffries : > On 12/12/2015 3:08 a.m., Fabio Bucci wrote: > > No suggestions? > > > > I've already suggested several times to use Kerberos. But the choice is > yours. > > Amos > >

Re: [squid-users] Squid with NTLM auth behind netscaler

On 12/12/2015 3:08 a.m., Fabio Bucci wrote: > No suggestions? > I've already suggested several times to use Kerberos. But the choice is yours. Amos ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/sq

Re: [squid-users] Squid with NTLM auth behind netscaler

No suggestions? 2015-12-07 14:57 GMT+01:00 Fabio Bucci : > Thanks Amos. > So, what do you suggest? Implement kerberos authetication instead NTLM one? > > I have to check if netscaler is able to perform that kind hack you wrote > before. > > Thanks again, > Fabio > > 2015-12-05 7:22 GMT+01:00 Amos

Re: [squid-users] https and URL rewriting

On 11/12/2015 10:30 p.m., Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > I'm using URL rewriting to display instant messages to users. I'm doing > it using traffic interception and squid in transparent mode, so far I'm > intercepting http only. But I wonder, how it will behave with https, > since it's a tunn

Re: [squid-users] Fw: Squid 32-bit (2.7.2) much faster than Squid 64-bit (3.5.11)

On 11/12/2015 10:16 p.m., TarotApprentice wrote: > Sorry should have replied to the list. > > MarkJ > > - Forwarded Message - >> From: Tarot Apprentice >> >> Looking at the startup logs the 3.4.11 says "store logging disabled" (it had >> an error) so would account for some of the differ

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.4, dstdomain

On 11/12/2015 10:00 p.m., Massimo.Sala wrote: >> Massimo > >>> 2015/12/10 10:33:49| ERROR: '.addons.mozilla.org' is a subdomain of >>> 'addons.mozilla.org' > > > > Francesco aka Kinkie > >> No bug, it is really intentional: ".addons.mozilla.org" also matches >> "addons.mozilla.org" (without th

Re: [squid-users] squid reverse proxy infront of exchange 2010

On 2015-12-10 10:29 pm, Alex Samad wrote: Hi I did the change over today. Tested with Window 7 + exchange 2010 and it wouldn't connect whilst there was no tls1 ! interesting IE worked against the web site so .. Did you come across this issues ? On 11 December 2015 at 11:09, dweimer wro

[squid-users] Antw: Kerberos-Authentication to AD 2012

Is there no one who could help me ? >>> "Rainer Backes" 02.12.2015 20:12 >>> Hi, I'm trying to build a Squid-Proxy that integrates with an Active Directory - and I think I'm only one step from succeeding, but I still get one error from negotiate_kerberos_auth. Here is my config: (everything is h

Re: [squid-users] issue with video

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5u1WrFLUfPiNWhXLVRJZnJETzA/view?usp=sharing I test with squid 3.5.10 (from debian testing repository) et no luck :( it doesn't work too To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org From: yvoi...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:25:46 +0600 Subject: Re: [squid-users]

[squid-users] https and URL rewriting

Hi. I'm using URL rewriting to display instant messages to users. I'm doing it using traffic interception and squid in transparent mode, so far I'm intercepting http only. But I wonder, how it will behave with https, since it's a tunneled connection ? I suppose, unless using ssl-Bum technique, squ

[squid-users] Fw: Squid 32-bit (2.7.2) much faster than Squid 64-bit (3.5.11)

Sorry should have replied to the list. MarkJ - Forwarded Message - >From: Tarot Apprentice >To: Patrick Flaherty >Sent: Friday, 11 December 2015, 14:10 >Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid 32-bit (2.7.2) much faster than Squid 64-bit >(3.5.11) > >Looking at the startup logs the 3.4.11

Re: [squid-users] squid 3.4, dstdomain

> Massimo >> 2015/12/10 10:33:49| ERROR: '.addons.mozilla.org' is a subdomain of >> 'addons.mozilla.org' Francesco aka Kinkie > No bug, it is really intentional: ".addons.mozilla.org" also matches > "addons.mozilla.org" (without the dot). Francesco, thank you for the explanation. Is it poss