Re: [squid-users] Getting updated squid builds (Debian)

2015-09-06 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 2/09/2015 1:03 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 2/09/2015 10:30 a.m., Tarot Apprentice wrote: >> Is there an easier way of getting updated builds on Debian? >> >> The Jessie (stable) repo has 3.4.8 in it. Even Stretch (testing/next >> release) has 3.4.8 in it. Only the experimental version is up

Re: [squid-users] proxy squid cache

2015-09-06 Thread Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
My master tesis was about that, I did a deepth research on how to get the max performance on your specific traffic. Document is public available in my website, okay.com.mx On Sep 6, 2015 7:59 AM, "Amos Jeffries" wrote: > On 6/09/2015 6:15 p.m., Int wrote: > > How I can configure of optimal form

Re: [squid-users] Bug in the squid snmp

2015-09-06 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
Well I cannot change the current snmp client but I can create a bridge from squidclient interface into SNMP. Eliezer On 06/09/2015 14:57, FredT wrote: Amos, Ok, i can understand that definition but why does squid display a wrong number ? in the concept that is the question ! If you must respe

Re: [squid-users] Bug in the squid snmp

2015-09-06 Thread FredT
Amos, Ok, i can understand that definition but why does squid display a wrong number ? in the concept that is the question ! If you must respect a Gauge32 type, just display the value in KB or MB or TB but display the right value, see what I mean ? Or add a new snmp line to indicate the units or f

Re: [squid-users] proxy squid cache

2015-09-06 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 6/09/2015 6:15 p.m., Int wrote: > How I can configure of optimal form the proxy's following parameters squid > > #--CACHE --# > cache_mem 256 MB > cache_swap_low 90 > cache_swap_high 95 > maximum_object_size 20480 KB > maximum_object_size_in_memory 128 KB > cache_replacement_policy heap GDSF >

Re: [squid-users] Bug in the squid snmp

2015-09-06 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 6/09/2015 11:34 p.m., Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 6/09/2015 8:20 p.m., FredT wrote: >> Hi Amos, >> >> So what ? >> I noticed it's a 32 bit integer >> with a "4,294,967,295" limit in unsigned but it cannot be an excuse to >> provide a wrong number... >> The

Re: [squid-users] cache proxy

2015-09-06 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 6/09/2015 11:46 a.m., Int wrote: > In servers's hierarchy proxy > > how I can do in order that the external web sites have split cache in the > external and internal proxy, > and how I can do that the internal web sites only have cache in the local > proxy > and no the rest of proxy's hier

Re: [squid-users] Bug in the squid snmp

2015-09-06 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 6/09/2015 8:20 p.m., FredT wrote: > Hi Amos, > > So what ? > I noticed it's a 32 bit integer > with a "4,294,967,295" limit in unsigned but it cannot be an excuse to > provide a wrong number... > The squidclient displays the right value but as the same

Re: [squid-users] tos miss-mask not working at all squid 3.5.5

2015-09-06 Thread mohammad
still suffering from child squid. the child is ignoring the PARENT_HIT and is not setting the zph_parent 0xXX any help with that ? -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/tos-miss-mask-not-working-at-all-squid-3-5-5-tp4671815p4673123.html Sent fro

Re: [squid-users] Bug in the squid snmp

2015-09-06 Thread FredT
Hi Amos, So what ? I noticed it's a 32 bit integer with a "4,294,967,295" limit in unsigned but it cannot be an excuse to provide a wrong number... The squidclient displays the right value but as the same value from the snmp is an unsigned so here it's all