Re: [squid-users] ETA for Bug 3775

Squid v3.5.7-20150821-r13895 Backtrace: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. DiskdFile::writeDone (this=, M=0x7fffe140) at DiskIO/DiskDaemon/DiskdFile.cc:389 389 ioRequestor->writeCompleted (DISK_OK,M->status, writeRequest); Missing separate debuginfos, use: deb

Re: [squid-users] can't get bump to work anymore on 3.5.7?

can you share your perl file /usr/local/bin/confirm_https.pl Thanks .. -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/can-t-get-bump-to-work-anymore-on-3-5-7-tp4672762p4672821.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: [squid-users] refresh_pattern and same objects

On 22/08/2015 5:06 a.m., FredB wrote: > Thank Amos, very interesting as usual > > So, my vision was old school (HTTP 1.0), I should read the recent > documentations to find something optimal for my caches without side > effect, in the past (squid 2.x I guess) I saw some objects changed in > websit

Re: [squid-users] refresh_pattern and same objects

Thank Amos, very interesting as usual So, my vision was old school (HTTP 1.0), I should read the recent documentations to find something optimal for my caches without side effect, in the past (squid 2.x I guess) I saw some objects changed in website who were never delivered by Squid (always th

Re: [squid-users] refresh_pattern and same objects

On 21/08/2015 11:39 p.m., FredB wrote: > Hi all, > > I think I misunderstand something but why refresh pattern is not useless ? > I mean the objects are supposed to be delivered with instructions from the > web server, lifetime, creation time, etc > Well, we like it when they do. Since that ma

[squid-users] Lots of "Vary object loop!"

Hello everyone, I'm having a strange problem: Several servers, same hardware, using same version of squid (3.5.4) compiled using the same configure options, same configuration files. But in two of them I get LOTS of these Vary object loop! lines in cache.log 2015/08/21 13:07:52 kid1| varyEval

Re: [squid-users] Using Squid as forward http proxy failing to complete request?

On 22/08/2015 1:39 a.m., asad wrote: > I'm using Squid as local proxy. > > I have the config file as below:-# > > > > * cache_peer 10.1.2.3 parent 8080 0 no-query default > login=my_username:my_passwordnever_direct allow all* > > Now, I want to use it as forward proxy For that the confi

[squid-users] Cache Drive Permission Issues

Hi, I am having an issue with my caching drives that I can't seem to pinpoint the problem. I have 4 drives to be used for caching, they are ext3 filesystems mounted like so. I am running CentOS 7. /dev/sde1 on /var/spool/squid4 type ext3 (rw,noatime,seclabel,data=ordered) /dev/sdd1 on /var/spool/

Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump updates coming in 3.5.8

On 21/08/2015 11:04 p.m., Marcus Kool wrote: > I do not want to spoil things, but did you already read my latest > addition to bug 4303 ? > > Marcus > Haven't had a chance to read the logs yet, but got the main text. Thank you. The main emphasis of the patch was getting the action ignore/skip a

[squid-users] Using Squid as forward http proxy failing to complete request?

I'm using Squid as local proxy. I have the config file as below:-# # Recommended minimum configuration: # # Example rule allowing access from your local networks. # Adapt to list your (internal) IP networks from where browsing # should be allowed acl localnet src 10.0.0.

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?

On 21/08/2015 8:46 p.m., Stakres wrote: > Amos, > > in the meantime, I was thinking another point: > We know there are at least 2 limit with cache_dirs, the max size and the 16+ > million entries (Filemap bits). > the cache_swap_high should take care both. > example: if the used cache is 95% of th

Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump updates coming in 3.5.8

ged. > > James > > ___ > squid-users mailing list > squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users Appears to work fine here: Squid Cache: Version 3.5.7-20150821-r13895 Service Name: squid conf

Re: [squid-users] refresh_pattern and same objects

Hi all, I think I misunderstand something but why refresh pattern is not useless ? I mean the objects are supposed to be delivered with instructions from the web server, lifetime, creation time, etc I thought, and it seem I'm wrong ?, that squid check the HTTP header when the object seems expi

Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump updates coming in 3.5.8

On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 19:28 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: > Hi all, > > Christos has managed (we think) to resolve a fairly major design issue > that has been plaguing the 3.5 series peek-and-splice feature so far. > () > > The problem was t

Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump updates coming in 3.5.8

I do not want to spoil things, but did you already read my latest addition to bug 4303 ? Marcus On 08/21/2015 04:28 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: Hi all, Christos has managed (we think) to resolve a fairly major design issue that has been plaguing the 3.5 series peek-and-splice feature so far.

Re: [squid-users] refresh_pattern and same objects

Amos, With this type of config, we'll keep in cache all stale and popular objects, I think we need special options: save_big_file on/off save_big_file_min_size 128 MB save_big_file_max_time 1 years It'll be more clear and precise, can we count of these options soon ? Bye fred -- View this mes

Re: [squid-users] refresh_pattern and same objects

Amos, We do use "cache_replacement_policy heap LFUDA", so it should do the job as you explain, right ? If i understand you correctly, we should also use something like that "max_stale 1 year", correct ? Thanks in advance. Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache

Re: [squid-users] refresh_pattern and same objects

On 21/08/2015 8:36 p.m., Stakres wrote: > Hi Amos, > Is that possible to have a dedicated option with the Squid to keep objects > in the cache if they're regulary used even if the time is expired ? > Cleaning small expired files (<16kb) is not a problem but we must keep big > files into the cache i

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?

Amos, in the meantime, I was thinking another point: We know there are at least 2 limit with cache_dirs, the max size and the 16+ million entries (Filemap bits). the cache_swap_high should take care both. example: if the used cache is 95% of the space or if the Filemap bits is 95% of the 16+ milli

Re: [squid-users] refresh_pattern and same objects

Hi Amos, Is that possible to have a dedicated option with the Squid to keep objects in the cache if they're regulary used even if the time is expired ? Cleaning small expired files (<16kb) is not a problem but we must keep big files into the cache if often used. There are many "small" ISPs with 2,

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?

Hi Amos, Thanks for the explaination. We'll try to apply the patch and will test with the customer, keep you posted asap... Bye Fred -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Squid-3-5-7-cache-swap-high-bug-or-not-bug-tp4672750p4672800.html Sent from

[squid-users] ssl_bump updates coming in 3.5.8

Hi all, Christos has managed (we think) to resolve a fairly major design issue that has been plaguing the 3.5 series peek-and-splice feature so far. () The problem was that Squid was not actually following the intended and documented logic

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.7, cache_swap_high, bug or not bug ?

On 21/08/2015 2:26 a.m., Stakres wrote: > Hi Amos, > > Any update ? > Spent the afternoon looking into it. There is now a patch in the bug report with some experimental changes. > This morning, it was crazy: > *Percent used: 100.76%* > How is it possible ? It seems all that documentation about