Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.4.14

On 30/07/2015 3:43 p.m., Dan Charlesworth wrote: > Hey folks > > Is 3.4.14 going to be a thing or should we be moving to v3.5 if we want new > bug fixes? > Well. Yes an 3.4 has a serious CVE that needs releasing. So it will be a thing this weekend. But no other bug fixes in the past few months

[squid-users] Squid 3.4.14

Hey folks Is 3.4.14 going to be a thing or should we be moving to v3.5 if we want new bug fixes? ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Re: [squid-users] Negative value for total memory accounted

Amos, it makes perfect sense now. After the convertion I have the real value Thanks, Sebastian El 29/07/15 a las 19:04, Amos Jeffries escribió: On 30/07/2015 9:29 a.m., Yuri Voinov wrote: Squid is 32 bit? And OS? Well, technically SNMP used by Squid is 32-bit. Squid itsef may be a 64-bit bui

Re: [squid-users] Negative value for total memory accounted

On 30/07/2015 9:29 a.m., Yuri Voinov wrote: > > Squid is 32 bit? And OS? Well, technically SNMP used by Squid is 32-bit. Squid itsef may be a 64-bit build and produce the same thing. > > 30.07.15 3:23, Sebastian Goicochea пишет: >> Hello, I'm having a problem monitoring squid memory usage. > >

Re: [squid-users] Negative value for total memory accounted

Sorry, both 64: Linux 3.1.10-1.16-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jun 27 05:21:40 UTC 2012 (d016078) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux /usr/local/sbin/squid: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.16, BuildID[sha1]=0x1b61472

Re: [squid-users] useragent.log

On 30/07/2015 9:26 a.m., HackXBack wrote: > ok bro thanks, > and whats about the cookies that the site used ? If you want to log those you need to create a custom log format. Its privacy related data useless to Squid and we dont enscourage recording that kind of thing in places that could be publ

Re: [squid-users] Negative value for total memory accounted

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Squid is 32 bit? And OS? 30.07.15 3:23, Sebastian Goicochea пишет: > Hello, I'm having a problem monitoring squid memory usage. > > Using SNMP: > SQUID-MIB::cacheMemUsage.0 = INTEGER: -1355105 > > Using squid-client: > Memory accounted for: >

Re: [squid-users] Negative value for total memory accounted

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Squid is 32 bit? And OS? 30.07.15 3:23, Sebastian Goicochea пишет: -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVuUW8AAoJENNXIZxhPexGDFoH/0i3JgkQYY40rnOuPBffv8H3 wMgLiqQJ322RB8bJKo+pQsG6mEdQiXsgXS2qOIVvAjLme3TIZgwntcA5UoaWo5v

Re: [squid-users] useragent.log

ok bro thanks, and whats about the cookies that the site used ? -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/useragent-log-tp4672505p4672537.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

[squid-users] Negative value for total memory accounted

Hello, I'm having a problem monitoring squid memory usage. Using SNMP: SQUID-MIB::cacheMemUsage.0 = INTEGER: -1355105 Using squid-client: Memory accounted for: Total accounted: -1369659 KB memPoolAlloc calls: 1995 memPoolFree calls: 653296188 Note that the value is negat

Re: [squid-users] LDAP Auth re-prompting for credentials on browser close, need suggestions

On 30/07/2015 2:21 a.m., Michael Monette wrote: > Hey, > > I configured the basic_ldap_helper from Squid to my LDAP. Everytime I > open the browser I am forced to re-auth. All of them except for > Internet Explorer..But who uses IE anyways? It seems like this is not > a Squid issue, but a browser

Re: [squid-users] Possible bug in 3.5.5 or a store change from 2.7?

On 29/07/2015 9:16 p.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > Just wondering how new is this option? > Very old. And ararelyusd, it sets a fixed debug level ALL,7. so the amount of data produced is almost as much as ALL,9. I keep forgetting about it and thinking we have to swap config files under Squid. :-(

Re: [squid-users] Squid 3.5.6 crash

On 30/07/2015 2:12 a.m., Alan wrote: > This might be the same crash reported in another thread, or a new one. > I noticed it after upgrading from 3.3.11 to 3.5.6. > This appears to be bug 4227. Please upgrade to the 3.5.6 snapshot to avoid it (or 3.5.7 will be out in a few days). Amos ___

Re: [squid-users] please help me test ext_ldap_group_acl from command line

Hi, I finally made it work. It does not matter if helper is started under my account or under squid account, it works both ways. Here's full command: ./ext_ldap_group_acl -R \ -b "DC=mimar,DC=rs" \ -D "CN=LDAP Binder,OU=00-System-00,OU=Users,OU=BG,OU=RS,DC=mimar,DC=rs" \

[squid-users] LDAP Auth re-prompting for credentials on browser close, need suggestions

Hey, I configured the basic_ldap_helper from Squid to my LDAP. Everytime I open the browser I am forced to re-auth. All of them except for Internet Explorer..But who uses IE anyways? It seems like this is not a Squid issue, but a browser thing. Found this post asking the same question: http:/

[squid-users] Squid 3.5.6 crash

This might be the same crash reported in another thread, or a new one. I noticed it after upgrading from 3.3.11 to 3.5.6. I'm using negotiate authentication (kerberos). Auth settings: auth_param negotiate program /usr/lib/squid/negotiate_kerberos_auth auth_param negotiate children 80 startup=5 id

Re: [squid-users] Possible bug in 3.5.5 or a store change from 2.7?

Just wondering how new is this option? Eliezer On 29/07/2015 03:50, Amos Jeffries wrote: That can be resolved somewhat by turning the logging on dynamically with "squid -k debug" shortly before and after a test is run. Amos ___ squid-users mailing

[squid-users] error : The description for Event ID 0 from source squid cannot be found.

Please help me out of the below error The description for Event ID 0 from source squid cannot be found. Either the component that raises this event is not installed on your local computer or the installation is corrupted. You can install or repair the component on the local computer Vivek Kumar