On 19/05/2015 5:49 a.m., Andres Granados wrote:
> hello!I need help on how to block pornographic images of google, I
> was trying different options and still do not succeed, try:
> http_reply_access with request_header_add, and even with a
> configuration dns, I think is to request_header_add the b
On 17/07/2015 11:40 a.m., HackXBack wrote:
> i have an idea for solve problems with sites and app's that work on port 443
> but cant establish connection with squid,
> i see that when this connection cant established the TCP_NONE appear in
> access.log,
> then why we cant use an option that when th
using
range_offset_limit none
ovet HTTP sites work without any assertoin error
but using it with HTTPS sites make this assertion error,
so there are problem between this option and 443 connection,
the problem is in https partial content only
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-p
i have an idea for solve problems with sites and app's that work on port 443
but cant establish connection with squid,
i see that when this connection cant established the TCP_NONE appear in
access.log,
then why we cant use an option that when this tcp_none come on some app
redirect it to TCP_TUNNE
Hi,
By "cache.log saying objects are not found" I meant
"DiskThreadsDiskFile::openDone: (2) No such file or directory".
(je n'avais plus le message en tete...)
Yes, still this message but it disapears at least 30 minutes later. So not a
problem to us with clients.
bye Fred
--
View this message
> Fred,
> The AUFS works for us, we switched all our clients back to the AUFS
> from
> DISKD.
> Yes, there are some Queue congestions at the squid restart (during 30
> min
> maxi), but as Amos said the Squid will re-adapt its internal value to
> fit
> the traffic, I can confirm that point.
> After
On 07/01/2015 06:49 AM, Othmar Truniger wrote:
> I'm glad I got your attention on this. I realized that when I did a
> quick code comparison. I also hope we get a quick fix for this
> because I would like to upgrade to a supported version soon.
I have updated the bug report with the current statu
Fred,
The AUFS works for us, we switched all our clients back to the AUFS from
DISKD.
Yes, there are some Queue congestions at the squid restart (during 30 min
maxi), but as Amos said the Squid will re-adapt its internal value to fit
the traffic, I can confirm that point.
After a while, the queue c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
In my case diskd only choice. On my platform aufs does not work at all.
And diskd gives the best result after careful tuning.
As I said earlier, the result is highly dependent on the platform,
hardware, and configuration. diskd was designed for a
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Fred.
>
> It's depending your OS.
>
> Depending your hardware.
>
> Depending your OS configuration.
>
> Tuning is very complex problem and tuning is EVIL.
>
> Remember it.
>
Yuri. my tests are very very basic
I think in this case
Hi Fred,
Same results from our side...
Does it mean we should catch the diskd engine from the 3.4.x and apply it
with the 3.5.x ?
Should be a good try to see if it works
bye Fred
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p46
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Fred.
It's depending your OS.
Depending your hardware.
Depending your OS configuration.
Tuning is very complex problem and tuning is EVIL.
Remember it.
PS. On MY platform diskd is the single choise. And it's very fast. 0.1
sec latency.
16.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Fred.
It's depending your OS.
Depending your hardware.
Depending your OS configuration.
Tuning is very complex problem and tuning is EVIL.
Remember it.
PS. On MY platform diskd is the single choise. And it's very fast.
16.07.15 21:00, FredB
Hello dear All :
i am writing testing download rate program recently ,
and i hope use reverse proxy ( squid 3.5.x) too ,
but if we use reverse proxy and i found Ajax won[t succeed to download
, and success: function(html,textStatus) -- return value ( html ) is blank .
if possible , please gi
> >
> > Not sure we'll have free time for testing the previous 3.4, we now
> > have
> > dozens of boxes to manually upgrade to the 3.5.6...
> > yes, we do use the original squid 3.5.6 package, no build mix here.
> >
>
> Ok I will, It would be interesting to understand what happen and if
> there
Hi I´m using squid with version 3.5.6 in an debian test system.
I try to bypass some sites using the "ssl::server_name" acl , to do that I need
to peek the connection first to decide if should be spliced or bumped.
But if I use peek at Step 1 , errors "client_side.cc(4245)
clientPeekAndSpliceSS
16 matches
Mail list logo
