cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
>
>
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
> Cumprimentos
> Pedro Lobo
> Solutions Architect | System Engineer
>
> pedro.l...@pt.clar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/10/2014 2:09 a.m., Ahmed Allzaeem wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to ask about Large rock supporting.
>
> In large rock supporting wts the max size for disk store ? and max
> size of ram store?
The disk store limit depends on HDD/SSD space available. T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/10/2014 11:11 a.m., Ahmed Allzaeem wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> Recently I used squid 3.4.3 for ipv6 for tcp_outgoing for many
> ipv6 addresses based on the username.
>
>
>
>
>
> I added about 1000 users with 1000 tcp_outgoing address but it
> didn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/10/2014 6:26 a.m., masterx81 wrote:
> Hi! I'm trying to check if a user is present in a Group, and now
> i'm using the following config:
>
> external_acl_type memberof ttl=30 %LOGIN
> /usr/local/squid/libexec/ext_ldap_group_acl -v 3 -R -K -b
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/10/2014 7:07 a.m., saleh madi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Why squid 3.4.8 Eating all of the Bandwidth:
>
> iptraf -d eth0 in the squid box
>
> Incoming rates: 435007.2 kbits/sec
> 50974.2 packets/sec
>
>
> Outgoing rates: 276229.9 kbits/sec
> 45
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/10/2014 5:37 a.m., Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
> On 27/10/14 11:47, Antony Stone wrote:
>> On Monday 27 October 2014 at 14:32:39 (EU time), Frantisek
>> Hanzlik wrote:
>>
>>> Please, what is best way for determining who squid clients
>>> (their PC
Hello Eliezer,
I did not mean to be rude, just forgot to type CentOS *7* stock Squid from the
distribution maintainers (not from you :)
The FF requires patching in gadget.cc otherwise it shows
sec_error_inadequate_key_usage for almost all SSL bumped pages. The new version
3.4.8 is probably bet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/27/2014 09:01 PM, Rafael Akchurin wrote:
> Default stock Squid in CentOS for example allows for SSL Sump out
> of the box (not for Firefox though).
Why not for firefox?
It is working on firefox and all other browsers while some will like
the cert
ng list
> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
> Cumprimentos
> Pedro Lobo
> Solutions Architect | System Enginee
Hi Markus,
When I get in to the office tomorrow, I'll do that and send you the .cap file.
Thanks for all the help so far.
Pedro Lobo
> On 27 Oct 2014, at 20:53, Markus Moeller wrote:
>
> Hi Pedro,
>
>Can you capture the traffic from one Windows 7 on XP client on port 88 (
> just afte
Hi Pedro,
Can you capture the traffic from one Windows 7 on XP client on port 88 (
just after the login before access a website via squid until successful or
unsuccessful accessing the website) using wireshark ? Send me the .cap files
to check.
Markus
"Pedro Lobo" wrote in message
news
Hi Markus Moeller,
Hi Markus,
Yeah, I'm currently using that option and permissions are correct too. ___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
Hi Pedro,
Did you try the –s GSS_C_NO_NAME option ?
Markus
"Pedro Lobo" wrote in message
news:94f74226-f24b-4910-95b7-b86ace815...@gmail.com...
Hey Everybody,
Seems as though I celebrated too soon on Saturday. Today things are back to not
working for Windows 7+ machines and XP/2003 machin
Hello Francesco,
You may want to look into ICAP servers for squid. The ICAP protocol was
designed to allow content adaptation. Squid supports ICAP since version 3.
Default stock Squid in CentOS for example allows for SSL Sump out of the box
(not for Firefox though). This allows you to enforce s
Hello,
Why squid 3.4.8 Eating all of the Bandwidth:
iptraf -d eth0 in the squid box
Incoming rates: 435007.2 kbits/sec
50974.2 packets/sec
Hi!
I'm trying to check if a user is present in a Group, and now i'm using the
following config:
external_acl_type memberof ttl=30 %LOGIN
/usr/local/squid/libexec/ext_ldap_group_acl -v 3 -R -K -b
"dc=domain,dc=local" -D squid@domain.local -W /etc/squid/ldappass.txt -f
"(&(objectclass=person)(sAMAc
Hey Everybody,
Seems as though I celebrated too soon on Saturday. Today things are back to not
working for Windows 7+ machines and XP/2003 machines are working just fine.
I've also checked the permissions on the keytab file and they haven't changed
since Saturday, so it's not that... ARGH
On 27/10/14 11:47, Antony Stone wrote:
On Monday 27 October 2014 at 14:32:39 (EU time), Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
Please, what is best way for determining who squid clients (their
PC IP addresses) have which downloads active?
I want it to determine which clients burden our slow internet line.
Ex
On Monday 27 October 2014 at 14:32:39 (EU time), Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> Please, what is best way for determining who squid clients (their
> PC IP addresses) have which downloads active?
> I want it to determine which clients burden our slow internet line.
> Examining 'access.log' does not help
Please, what is best way for determining who squid clients (their
PC IP addresses) have which downloads active?
I want it to determine which clients burden our slow internet line.
Examining 'access.log' does not help much in this case, because users
can download large files and it may take a few mi
I have some proof of concept on my github. it can be done thought DNS
hijacking. I modified a version of tinyproxy to enforce safe search.
you can check it out on https://github.com/polaco1782/tinyproxy
2014-10-25 9:49 GMT-02:00 Job :
> Hello, since Google switch definitely on SSL connection it s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/10/2014 1:01 a.m., Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 28/10/2014 12:57 a.m., Jorge Visentini wrote:
>> Hello!
>
>> Sorry my english.
>
>> I'm racking my brain to figure out why the error.
>
>> I've used a long time ago a rule delay pool but this time I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/10/2014 12:57 a.m., Jorge Visentini wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Sorry my english.
>
> I'm racking my brain to figure out why the error.
>
> I've used a long time ago a rule delay pool but this time I am not
> able to implement ...
>
> In my squid.con
Hello!
Sorry my english.
I'm racking my brain to figure out why the error.
I've used a long time ago a rule delay pool but this time I am not able to
implement ...
In my squid.conf looks like this:
delay_pools 1
delay_class 1 3
delay_parameters 1 5/5 24000/24000
delay_access 1 allow re
Hello!
Sorry my english.
I'm racking my brain to figure out why the error.
I've used a long time ago a rule delay pool but this time I am not able to
implement ...
In my squid.conf looks like this:
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/10/2014 12:17 a.m., saleh madi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have in the same box four squid 3.4.8 instances, I'm not using
> the workers Option. I will need to peering the multiple instances
> together to avoid duplication of objects. The below setting
Hello,
I have in the same box four squid 3.4.8 instances, I'm not using the workers
Option. I will need to peering the multiple instances together to avoid
duplication of objects. The below setting works for squid 2.7 but I have tested
with squid 3.4.8 doesn't work.
In SQUID2:
cache_peer squi
27 matches
Mail list logo
