Hi Experts,
I would like to know whether *Carbon *release will support the following:
1) BGP-LS support :
- BGP Link state protocol for learning the topology (links and nodes)
2) PCE support :
- Does ODL have the support of PCE to compute a path between two
endpoints with the given constra
Hi Experts,
Could you please explain me what would be the expected behavior in the
following scenario in *Quarantine approach*.
Mapping entries *E1, E2, E3 *are Active entries.
In case, if incoming new entry say *X *which has conflict with *E1, E2
and E3.*
Assume, *X is better than E1 b
Hi Experts,
Can someone reply please.
Rgds,
Kaliyaperumal K
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 7:51 AM, tech_kals Kals wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
> Could you please explain me what would be the expected behavior in the
> following scenario in *Quarantine approach*.
>
> Mapping e
ue
>
>Se - End SID value
>
>R - Range value (See Note 1)
>
>T - Topology
>
>A - Algorithm
>
>
>
>A Mapping Entry is then the tuple: (Prf, Src, Pi/L, Si, R, T, A)
>
>
>
> Thanx.
>
>
>
>Les
>
>
> Scenario 1 - I do not see any prefix conflict. Those are independent /24
> prefixes.
>
> Scenario 2 - X IP prefix will be installed in RIB but SR labels (entire
> range) will be blocked for X.
>
> Scenario 3 - I do not see any prefix conflict. SR labels (entire range)
gt;2. Smaller range wins
>
>3. IPv6 entry wins over IPv4 entry
>
>4. Longer prefix length wins
>
>5. Smaller algorithm wins
>
>6. Smaller starting address (considered as an unsigned integer
>
>value) wins
>
>7. Smal
17 at 8:52 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) wrote:
> Kals –
>
>
>
> Inline…look for “Les2”
>
>
>
> *From:* tech_kals Kals [mailto:tech.k...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 18, 2017 11:40 PM
> *To:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> *Cc:* spring@ietf.org; Peter Psenak (ppsenak);
Hi Experts,
I have few questions on Segment Routing. Can you please clarify my doubts.
1) How OAM can be done in segment-routed networks ?
I think, MPLS OAM is not possible with SR as network infrastructure
doesn't have any LSP state.
With SDN controller in place, do we really need tr
e NOT a replacement for BGP/MPLS IP VPNs.
>
> Thumb typed by Sasha Vainshtein
>
> ------
> *From:* spring on behalf of tech_kals Kals <
> tech.k...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 6, 2019 5:56:35 AM
> *To:* ask-segment-rout...@cisco.com
Hi experts,
Would like to know which SID can be used for the interfaces which are
having same IP address and have different VRFs.
Assume there are two interfaces on the same router.
Both are having same IP address and they are differentiated using VRF.
So, the config looks as shown below.
e
Hi Experts,
I just want to know how will the traffic handoff happen from aggregate
network to core network ?
Assume, core is running RSVP-TE, so IP handoff can be done on edge router ?
I don't think, SDN controller can control RSVP enabled routers. So, how it
is to make end-to-end TE i.e fro
Hi experts,
Am so curious to know about how OAM can be supported on segment-routing
networks ?
I think, MPLS OAM is not possible with SR as network infrastructure doesn't
have any LSP state.
With SDN controller in place, do we really need traditional OAM ?
Assume, SDN controller can identify
that are design and deployment
> specific.
>
>
>
> Hope this helps.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ketan
>
>
>
> *From:* spring *On Behalf Of *tech_kals Kals
> *Sent:* 08 March 2019 10:33
> *To:* Alexander Vainshtein
> *Cc:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; sp
Hi,
Can someone have a look at my question please.
thanks,
__kals__
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:45 AM tech_kals Kals wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
>
> I just want to know how will the traffic handoff happen from aggregate
> network to core network ?
>
> Assume, core is running R
Hi,
Can someone have a look at this issue ?
thanks,
__kals__
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:49 AM tech_kals Kals wrote:
> Hi experts,
>
> Am so curious to know about how OAM can be supported on segment-routing
> networks ?
>
>
> I think, MPLS OAM is not possible with SR as n
please ignore my previous email..
hi,
can someone answer my question please ?
thanks,
kals
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:44 AM tech_kals Kals wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone have a look at this issue ?
>
> thanks,
> __kals__
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:49 AM tech_
16 matches
Mail list logo