rules.
Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
From: 王博
Date: 2022-07-14 10:39
To: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Segment Routing in Two Dimensional IP Routing
Dear SPRING WG,
We have submitted a draft “Segment Routing in Two Dimensional IP Routing” to
SPRING WG. We are looking
cable scene?
Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
发件人： Tianran Zhou
发送时间： 2022-12-24 11:18
收件人： Rakesh Gandhi
抄送： Gyan Mishra; IETF IPPM WG; SPRING WG
主题： Re: [spring][ippm] Progressing the PBT-M “Zero Overhead property” draft
Hi Rakesh,
Thanks very much for your suggestion.
I
Hello Joel an all,
I support the publication of this document. Our tests show that implementations
of Compressed SRv6 from different vendors under our tests interoperate
smoothely.
Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
China Mobile
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
From: Joel Halpern
Date: 2024-01-22 22:28
To
,
Zhenqiang Li
China Mobile
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
___
spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to spring-le...@ietf.org
What do you mean by the SRV6 base draft?
Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
From: Jaganbabu Rajamanickam \(jrajaman\)
Date: 2020-07-15 19:36
To: James Guichard; spring@ietf.org
CC: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang
I support the adoption since this doc is an integral member of the SRv6
standard family.
Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
From: James Guichard
Date: 2020-07-14 05:52
To: spring@ietf.org
CC: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring
I support the adoption since this doc is an integral member of the SR standard
family.
Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
From: James Guichard
Date: 2020-07-13 23:37
To: spring@ietf.org
CC: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-sr
fowarding
scenarios rather than TE or policy paths.
Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
From: Joel M. Halpern
Date: 2020-08-04 02:35
To: Robert Raszuk
CC: spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] Spring protection - determining applicability
(Since the thread has gotten long enough
Hello All，
I've read the doc and support the adoption with the following comment.
For two way loss measurement for SRv6 policy, it is better to add some texts to
describe the way to get the reverse path for the specific SRv6 policy.
Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
li_zhenqi...@hotmai
Hello All，
I've read the doc and support the adoption with the following comment.
For two way loss measurement for SRv6 policy, it is better to add some texts to
describe the way to get the reverse path.
Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
li_zhenqi...@hotmai
Yes, the working group SHOULD standardize one data plane behavior for
compressing SRv6 information.
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
From: Joel M. Halpern
Date: 2021-08-05 02:52
To: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Progressing Standardizing SR over IPv6 compression
The SPRING Working Group Chairs
1gC8Xrk
- https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/oDWLbRDqKCaF5Xa-QvKY6mk_D5E
Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
From: bruno.decra...@orange.com
Date: 2019-12-06 01:15
To: 'SPRING WG List'
CC: 6...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Subject: WGLC - draft
12 matches
Mail list logo
