I would suggest that people read RFC 7282 - "On Consensus and Humming
in the IETF", especially Sections 3 & 6 (it is a short document, you
should read the whole thing, but pay special attention to these
sections).
It doesn't really matter how many people say +1 for moving it forwards
-- if there a
; > the WGLC and advancing the document (of course, the document shepherd will
> > need to carefully write the section about the rough WG consensus).
> >
> > Finally, as far as I know, at the IETF we have no religion... else we would
> > still be running NCP or IPv4 :-)
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:27 PM Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>
> THere is one nuance that is worth noting. It is not for the case of a
> controversial document.
>
> Rather, the case where +1 can be useful is when the question is whether
> the working group even cares about the document. I have had sev
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 9:02 AM Robert Raszuk wrote:
>
> > interestingly enough MPLS took the same approach
>
> Well not really. As you know, MPLS unicast and multicast have a new ethertype.
And this is a critical distinction -- Brian Carpenter's limited domain
document (draft-carpenter-limited-d
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 11:07 AM wrote:
>
> Sander,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sander Steffann [mailto:san...@steffann.nl]
> > Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 9:03 PM
> > To: DECRAENE Bruno TGI/OLN
> > Cc: SPRING WG List; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming; 6man WG
> > Subject:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 1:13 PM Pete Resnick wrote:
>
> On 10 Mar 2020, at 10:41, Nico Williams wrote:
>
> > ...the process we have for
> > dealing with complaints is heavily biased against plaintiffs -- which
> > is
> > probably as it should be, as otherwise we might never get anything
> > done,
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:15 PM wrote:
>
> Hello SPRING,
>
>
>
> This email starts a two weeks Working Group Last Call on
> draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming [1].
>
>
>
> Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent version, and
> send your comments to the SPRING WG l
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 6:22 PM Fernando Gont wrote:
>
> Bruno,
>
> On 10/12/19 13:18, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
> > Fernando,
> >
> > Thank you for spelling out your comment, plus on the WGLC thread.
> > More in-line
> >
> >> Bruno,
> >>
> >> On 5/12/19 12:15, bruno.decra...@orange.com wro
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment-15: Abstain
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-19: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
10 matches
Mail list logo
