Hi WG,
Agreed that the resolution is reasonable and issue #5 can be closed. Issues #3
and #4 can also be closed.
Regards,
Haibo
From: spring On Behalf Of Joel Halpern
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 11:00 PM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Confimring resolution of issue #5
https://datatra
Hi Ketan,
I think the overall description is OK. But is it appropriate to use the
word "fallback mechanism"?
Regards,
Haibo
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ketan Talaulikar
(ketant)
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 11:00 AM
To: b...@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-
, while SRv6 Policy is down.
So I think maybe use “alternate steering mechanism” is better. Or maybe I
misunderstood the sentence?
Regards,
Haibo
From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) [mailto:ket...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 4:55 PM
To: Wanghaibo (Rainsword) ; b...@ietf.org
Cc: draft
Hi WG,
We are working on SRv6 for many years, and a lots of innovations are built on
SRv6. CSID uses the existing SRv6 data plane and control plane extensions to
provide efficient encoding of SRH so that we can mitigate a lot of complexities
and workload of implementation and standardization. T
I have read through both drafts. And I support the WG adoption of them.
Best Regards,
Haibo
From: Idr [mailto:idr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 2:13 AM
To: 'idr wg' ; 'SPRING WG List'
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-se
