Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

2020-03-02 Thread Tim Chown
> On 28 Feb 2020, at 01:51, Brian E Carpenter > wrote: > > Pablo, > > I have been looking at the latest version. See my previous note to Stefano > Salsano. I really think that the problem here is that certain things are > obvious to SRH experts but not to others, and they simply need more >

Re: [spring] Spirit and Letter of the Law (was: Question about SRv6 Insert function)

2019-09-05 Thread Tim Chown
> On 5 Sep 2019, at 14:05, Ole Troan wrote: > > I have not changed my position with regards to header insertion. > I'm arguing that you should argue technical merit on actual proposals. > Instead of trying to make RFC documents apply as laws and slap people over > the head with those... You mad