[spring] FW: Call for publication of draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-18 - with multiple partial implementations (6/17 to 6/30)

IDR WG (see below) to determine whether the IDR WG should publish with partial implementations. We welcome comments on the IDR mail thread, and Implementers may add details to the implementation report. Thank you, Sue Hares From: Susan Hares Sent: Friday, June 17, 2022 9:15 AM To: i

[spring] FW: Call for publication of draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-18 - with multiple partial implementations (6/17 to 6/30)

dr-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:idr-cha...@ietf.org>). Cheers, Sue - From: Susan Hares Sent: Friday, June 17, 2022 9:15 AM To: i...@ietf.org<mailto:i...@ietf.org> Subject: Call for publication of draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-18 - with multiple partial imp

[spring] CAR/CT Adoption call (7/6 to 7/20) - Please provide us your feedback

spring WG: Today we started the WG adoption call for the the CAR/CT drafts. This adoption call has the following two parts: Part-1: Questions on technology direction https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/FhoK04HsSy9tR7ioV7AD0Vv6Ir4/ Part-2: Adoption of the drafts https://mailarchi

Re: [spring] [bess] [Pals] [EXTERNAL] Re: Martini Pseudowires and SR

Gyan: IDR WG have also adopted draft-ietf-idr-sr-p2mp-policy-00 Jeffrey Zhang has joined as co-author. Work is undergoing in the author group To help align it to other work. It will be WG LC in IDR and BESS. Cheers, Sue From: B

[spring] draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy - pre-adoption shepherd's review

This is a pre-adoption shepherd's review from the IDR chairs on the following draft: draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-09 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr/ What it defines: New Segment types for SR Policy (types L, M, N, O) What IDR drafts aug

[spring] draft-ietf-idr-cpr-02

Spring WG: draft-ietf-idr-cpr-02.txt is an informational draft that has past WG LC. I'm writing up the shepherd's report for this draft and I need some information from Spring. draft-ietf-idr-cpr-02.txt reports on the use of H.Insert.Red. H.Insert is defined in [draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-

[spring] Re: draft-ietf-idr-cpr-02

: Susan Hares Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org; idr-cha...@ietf.org; Dongjie (Jimmy) ; i...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org Subject: RE: draft-ietf-idr-cpr-02 Hi Susan, Please see inline [Bruno

[spring] [Idr] Re: Adoption call for draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr-11 (7/12/2024 to 7/26/2024)

IDR WG: The IDR WG has reached consensus to adopt draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr-11. The authors should submit this document as: draft-ietf-idr-sr-te-policy-attr-00.txt. Cheerily, Sue Hares ___ spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org T

Re: [spring] [Idr] 2 Week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis (7/9/2021 to 7/25/2021) - WG call concluded

. If the bess or spring working groups know of any errors, please send message to the IDR work and/or contact the idr chairs. Cheerily, Susan Hares ___ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

[spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)

This begins a 2 week IDR WG last call on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe from (2/15 to 3/1/2017)There are two implementations describe on the wiki at: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe %20 The two implementation are from Cisco IOS-XR re

Re: [spring] [Idr] [ALU] Re: IDR WG 2 week WG LC ondraft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)

: Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE); Susan Hares; i...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] [Idr] [ALU] Re: IDR WG 2 week WG LC ondraft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017) Likewise. And it’s worth noting that OpenDaylight has an open-source implementation

[spring] Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-03

Reviewer: Susan Hares Review result: Has Issues The RTG-DIR has the categories: minor concerns or major concerns regarding "issues", I wil differentiate my issues by this quality. I also have editorial nits regardign under specified text. Major concerns: 1) The security sect

Re: [spring] [RTG-DIR] Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-03

ESG review will provide you lots of feedback on editorial nits. Sue -Original Message- From: rtg-dir [mailto:rtg-dir-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 6:21 AM To: Susan Hares Cc: rtg-...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;

Re: [spring] [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-04.txt - 3/6 to 3/20/2017

Bruno: Thank you for cross-posing this to the spring WG. Sue From: bruno.decra...@orange.com [mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 11:51 AM To: Susan Hares Cc: 'Hannes Gredler'; spring@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC

Re: [spring] [Idr] Signalling ERLD (ISIS, OSPF and BGP-LS)

Stephane, Gunter, Ketan, Les, and Jeff: Are you going to settle on option 2? Will we be seeing drafts with this change in this revision? Sue Hares -Original Message- From: Idr [mailto:idr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 6:05

Re: [spring] [Idr] draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy

Bruno and Ketan: It is important to get the registries and the early allocation aligned. After Bruno returns, perhaps the chairs can chat about the options with the authors. Cheerily, Sue From: Idr [mailto:idr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Sent: Thursday, A

Re: [spring] [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - 1 week extension [10/14 to 10/21/2019]

the members of both the IDR and SPRING WG comment on whether these drafts have matured enough to be IDR WG drafts. On 10/21/2019, the IDR chairs will make a determination of whether either of these two drafts have enough support to be accepted. Thank you, Susan Hares IDR co-chair From

Re: [spring] [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt and draft-li-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - 1 week extension [10/14 to 10/21/2019]

Greetings: I will be tallying the results for the extended week late today. If anyone wishes to comment on the adoption, please do so today. Sue Hares From: Idr On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: 14 October 2019 23:43 To: 'idr wg' ; 'SPRING WG List' Subject: Re: [

[spring] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-07

<mailto:idr-cha...@ietf.org>, join the IDR WG list and send comments in WG Last call at: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/DNolDYwwvwXrrQKlIragYal3j2k/ You may send private comments to me directly. IDR allows for comments on implementation supporting a draft to be sent Privately. Cheerily,

[spring] Status of two documents

-ietf-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn. Can you please tell me the status of these two documents? I would like to include this status in the shepherd's report for draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-10.txt. Cheerily, Susan Hares ___ spring mailing list -- s

[spring] Need Spring review of draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-nrp-03

Joel, Alvaro, Bruno and Spring WG: IDR requests an in-depth review of draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-03. Context: During the WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-nrp-03 (3/14 to 4/4/2025), (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/MsMiPqRTmOfG7mkvtJd_8n2hC-0/) the responses to the IDR WGL LC from Zafar