Hi WG,
I reviewed the draft, and support the adoption. The proposal may be a
useful improvement of SR architecture, and it will be valuable to consider
it.
The follows are my comments:
- Regarding scalability, it will depend on how to design configurations,
and I think that there is little differ
Hi WG,
I think that this document is good enough as starting point for the WG, and
I support the adoption. There are many drafts related to network slice with
SR (e.g., SR + Flex-algo, draft-bestbar-spring-scalable-ns, etc.) and I
hope it will be clarified which is the best in future work.
The fo
Hi Joel and WG,
> Should the working group standardize one data plane behavior for
> compressing SRv6 information?
Yes, we should pick up and standardize a single solution for SRv6
compression. Interoperability is one of important factors for operators.
Multi-options may prevent interoperability.