Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] Re: [Pals] Martini Pseudowires and SR

Agree with Stewart. T-PEs could be intra or inter-AS and could get unwieldy when interworking with mixture of legacy and (newer) lightweight T-LDP peers. Thanks, Himanshu From: Pals on behalf of Stewart Bryant Date: Monday, May 30, 2022 at 4:10 AM To: Andrew Alston - IETF , p...@ietf.org ,

Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression

Hi Joel and WG – I support the WG last call. We, at Ciena, have implemented the NEXT functionality (uSID) in our products, done interop testing with other vendors at EANTC and have been engaged in active deployments. Thanks, Himanshu From: spring on behalf of Shay Zadok Date: Tuesday, Ja

Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] Re: C-SIDs and upper layer checksums (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)

All – I agree with Ketan/Boris and the points they have made (no need to repeat them again). In general, srh-compression technology has been accepted, implemented and deployed by many vendors and service providers. The issue of some legacy nodes not being able to ascertain final destination and

Re: [spring] Clarifications for draft-karboubi-spring-sidlist-optimized-cs-sr-00.txt

Friday, April 5, 2024 at 11:32 AM To: spring@ietf.org Cc: Shah, Himanshu Subject: Clarifications for draft-karboubi-spring-sidlist-optimized-cs-sr-00.txt Hello, We have presented draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-karboubi-spring-sidlist-optimized-cs-sr/ [datatracker.ietf.org]

Re: [spring] Clarifications for draft-karboubi-spring-sidlist-optimized-cs-sr-00.txt

independent draft. Let us continue the discussions.. Thanks, Himanshu From: Karboubi, Amal Date: Wednesday, May 1, 2024 at 2:31 PM To: Andrew Stone (Nokia) , Ketan Talaulikar , Shah, Himanshu Cc: spring@ietf.org , z...@cisco.com , cschm...@cisco.com , Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz) Subject

[spring] Review of sidlist-optimtized-cs-sr draft

Hello WG/Christian/Ketan/Andrew/Zafar – We have posted an updated version of draft-karboubi-spring-sidlist-optimized-cs-sr-01 - Circuit Style Segment Routing Policies with Optimized SID List Depth (ietf.org) that a

Re: [spring] IETF 91 Draft Agenda (spring)

Hi Alvaro - Would it be possible to accommodate 5-10min slot for http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-xu-pce-sr-sfc-02.txt? Thanks, himanshu From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana (aretana) Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 5:59 PM To: spring@ietf.org Cc: spring-cha...@to

Re: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-03.txt

Need to fix the section 5.1 and 5.2 to refer to the nodes shown in the figures. For example, section 5.1 refers to S1 (should be SL1) node which is absent in figure 4. Similarly, R6 (should be S6) in section 5.2. Thanks, Himanshu -Original Message- From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ie

Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] Re: WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang

I support the adoption of this draft. Thanks, Himanshu From: spring on behalf of "Kamran Raza (skraza)" Date: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 at 2:38 AM To: James Guichard , "spring@ietf.org" Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-

Re: [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

I agree with some of the opinions expressed here wrt transit LSR not completely immune of statelessness; lightweight (counters only) or otherwise. Another point that Greg made is important to underline. If such radioactive flows generate counters at LSRs, there needs to be a way to clear them,

Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] Re: SPRING - rechartering discussion

Agree with Jeff, without harping on all the good reasons already stated for SPRING WG charter extensions, I would think that it would be beneficial to leverage TE expertise from TEAS WG to progress SR-TE there for a cohesive, uniform solution for all tunneling schemes. IMHO.. Thanks, Himanshu F

Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] IPR Poll: draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-programming

I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Thanks, Himanshu From: spring on behalf of Rob Shakir Date: Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 2:14 AM To: "draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-programm...@ietf.org" , "spring@ietf.org" Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] [spring] IPR Poll: draft-xuclad-spring-sr-se

Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] Fw: WG Adoption Call: draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-programming

Done.. Thanks, Himanshu From: "徐小虎(义先)" Reply-To: "徐小虎(义先)" Date: Sunday, August 4, 2019 at 10:46 PM To: Stewart Bryant , Hamid Assarpour , "Shah, Himanshu" , LUIS MURILLO , Jeff Tantsura , "Martin com>" , "d...@dirksteinberg.de" ,

[spring] Re: Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-spring-cs-sr-policy

WG, I endorse the WG document and believe that it is ready for the next step. It is an important work that is addressing the need of some service providers. Having said that, (we – Amal and myself) would like to bring up a point that was made to the author, a couple of meetings ago. This is abo

[spring] Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: [bess] Re: Inverse multi-layer OAM

link 1hop-BFD OAMs to be set at 10ms for 3 miss – still good convergence within 50ms for all other traffic and services while be able to handle the CS-SR optimized use case simultaneously. Thanks, Himanshu From: Greg Mirsky Date: Thursday, March 20, 2025 at 11:45 AM To: Shah, Himanshu Cc: Zafar

[spring] Re: [bess] Re: Inverse multi-layer OAM

to comment on the running thread rather than middle of the thread causing the forks. Please take this discussions to the SPRING mailing list. Thanks, Himanshu From: Zafar Ali (zali) Date: Thursday, March 20, 2025 at 11:19 AM To: Joel Halpern , Greg Mirsky , Robert Raszuk Cc: Shah, Himanshu

[spring] Re: [bess] Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Re: Inverse multi-layer OAM

In line.. Thanks, Himanshu From: Zafar Ali (zali) Date: Thursday, March 20, 2025 at 12:07 PM To: Shah, Himanshu , Greg Mirsky Cc: Robert Raszuk , BESS , draft-karboubi-spring-sidlist-optimized-cs...@ietf.org , Zafar Ali (zali) Subject: Re: [bess] Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: Re: Inverse multi

[spring] Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Inverse multi-layer OAM

protection. As I mentioned, this behavior is more preferable to transport centric service providers that we have talked to. Thanks, Himanshu Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> From: Greg Mirsky Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 11:05:13 AM To

[spring] Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Inverse multi-layer OAM

Some edits on the below (that was sent from phone). Also combining the thread since the question was posted on bess as well spring wg list. Thanks, Himanshu From: Shah, Himanshu Date: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 at 12:40 PM To: Greg Mirsky , spring Cc: draft-karboubi-spring-sidlist-optimized