[spring] Comments on -01 version of the draft

2022-08-29 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
ator Block Node Length or Locator Node Length somewhere in the model? Or is that out of scope of this document? Thanks. Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com ___ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Re: [spring] Slot request for IETF 100

2017-11-02 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
_ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org <mailto:spring@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring> Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com ___ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Re: [spring] Slot request for IETF 100

2017-11-03 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
I would suggest that the draft define the augmentation of the SR yang model. Operationally, defining the statistics without defining how they can be retrieved does not make sense. Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com > On Nov 3, 2017, at 5:51 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: >

Re: [spring] Slot request for IETF 100

2017-11-03 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
. But I think that > belongs in a separate document from where the path identifier is defined. > > Do you all want to sit down in Singapore and talk through the model > augmentation. > > Adrian > > > From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mahe

[spring] Re: Mahesh Jethanandani's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-11: (with COMMENT)

2025-02-07 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
be, e.g., by documenting it here. Since this is a non-blocking comment, I will let the authors decide how best they want to achieve that. Thanks. > > Thanks, > Ketan > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 3:03 AM Mahesh Jethanandani via Datatracker > mailto:nore...@ietf.org>