Re: [spring] 6MAN WGLC: draft-ietf-6man-sids

2022-09-30 Thread Fred Baker
It talks about a signal, but the signal is currently undefined. Therefore there has to be some new protocol or a configuration parameter, perhaps carried by DHCP. Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways... > On Sep 30, 2022, at 7:25 PM, Chongfeng Xie wrote: > >  > Hi,folks

Re: [spring] “SRV6+” complexity in forwarding

2019-09-19 Thread Fred Baker
> On Sep 18, 2019, at 4:41 PM, Darren Dukes (ddukes) wrote: > > The complexity of "SRv6+" requires ASICs do much more work per packet vs SRv6. Duh. More processing is more processing, whether done in hardware, software, or firmware. I'm not a fan of segment routing for several reasons, but t

Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status-02.txt

2019-10-17 Thread Fred Baker
> On Oct 17, 2019, at 5:30 AM, Lizhenbin wrote: > > In the past two years, China pushed the IPv6 deployment and almost all the IP > networks of operators achieve the goal "IPv6 Ready". This provide a strong > base for SRv6 deployments which can help operators provide new services based > on

[spring] Next Segment in draft-previdi-6man-segment-routing-header

2014-11-20 Thread Fred Baker (fred)
I’m looking at th definition of Next Segment: o Next Segment (originally defined as "Segments Left" in [RFC2460]): index, in the Segment List, of the next active segment (according to terminology defined in [I-D.filsfils-spring-segment-routing]) in the SRH. Note that this di