Hello,
I am interested in doing the review for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
as well, and I qualify according to the criteria you get.
Best regards,
Antoine
-Original Message-
From: spring On Behalf Of Joel Halpern
Sent: mercredi 6 septembre 2023 19:12
To: SPRING WG List
Sub
Hello,
I tend to agree with Andrew that the fact that the verification of a L4
checksum by a middlebox breaks is a problem. But I think this is a huge problem
with the middleboxes, not with SRv6.
According to me, reading RFC 8200 gives rather clear guidelines with regards to
the computation of
more general than C-SID’s discussion.
Best regards,
Antoine Fressancourt
From: spring On Behalf Of Andrew Alston - IETF
Sent: mercredi 27 mars 2024 07:25
To: Tom Herbert ; Ron Bonica
Cc: Alexander Vainshtein ; spring@ietf.org;
Robert Raszuk ; Alvaro Retana
Subject: Re: [spring] Chair Review
isolation principle
wouldn’t be able to make such violations properly, I don’t think the hearing is
that red.
Best regards,
Antoine
From: Andrew Alston - IETF
Sent: mercredi 27 mars 2024 09:48
To: Antoine FRESSANCOURT ; Tom Herbert
; Ron Bonica
Cc: Alexander Vainshtein ; spring@ietf.org;
Robert
with omitting the SRH and giving an alternative is enough, and
gives some freedom to people willing to use C-SID without SRH in their context.
Best regards,
Antoine Fressancourt
-Original Message-
From: spring On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana
Sent: jeudi 28 mars 2024 13:06
To: SPRING WG List
, as I think
this was the intention in RFC 8200's text.
Best regards,
Antoine Fressancourt
-Original Message-
From: spring On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana
Sent: jeudi 28 mars 2024 13:05
To: SPRING WG List
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] C-SIDs and upper layer checksums
(
Hello,
I have read this draft several times, and it is a very valuable document, thus
I support its adoption.
I am eager to see some elements listed in the "Topics for further
consideration" developed in the future final RFC stemming from this document.
Best regards,
Antoine
> -Origina
Hello,
Sorry for my delayed answer. I have some additional questions or
clarifications, prefixed with [AFT].
Best regards,
Antoine Fressancourt
From: Feng Yang
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 2:24 PM
To: Antoine FRESSANCOURT ; linchangwang
; spring@ietf.org; n...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring
Hello,
Thanks a lot for your clarifications. Please see some additional remarks
prefixed with [AFT2] inline.
Best regards,
Antoine Fressancourt
From: 刘鹏辉
> [AFT]
> Let me please clarify the notation so we are on the same page.
> Let’s denote H_N(x) the hash of byte string x key
Hello,
I read your draft with a lot of interest. It comes as a complement of
previously proposed mechanisms. As a disclaimer, I am a co-author of the now
expired draft-iannone-spring-srv6-pot-00
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-iannone-spring-srv6-pot-00).
First I have a clarificat
10 matches
Mail list logo
