Isupport the adoption
BR
Ahmed El Sawaf
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 7:39 PM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-spring-srv6-path-segment
Dear WG:
This messa
Hello
I am Supporting the adoption of this document. The mechanism provided in this
document can help us to build customized virtual networks for different types
of services with diverse performance requirements.
From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 2:47
Gents
As an operator, we do hope to reduce the number of solutions, so that we do not
need to deploy multiple solutions. I hope the WG can standard one single
solution.
Also, since the CSID has been implemented by most vendors, I will suggest to
adopt CSID at the beginning.
BR
AS
From: sprin
Dears
we want to have less solutions for sure, we do not want to introduce more
complexities in our network, so please choose one solution.
Apparently, we should standardize CSID.
-Original Message-
From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 10:28 PM
To: J
Happy to see the adoption call was issued after a long-term discussion. As an
operator, we have deployed SRv6 in our network, and we are paying attention to
the topic of SRv6 compression all the time.
Thinking as an operator, we need the compression is defined based on SRv6 data
plane, and CS
