Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call - draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection (02/09/24 - 02/24/24)

Hi Yingzhen & WG，  I support the adoption of this draft.  [draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection-05] is easy to implement, and it's simple to deploy. The replies to several questions are as follows:  •  Do we need these different solutions?  Yes. They are suitable for different

Re: [spring] C-SIDs and upper layer checksums (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)

Hi WG,  I agree with the modification of V-15.  And it's recommended to expedite the completion of the last call process for this standard.  Since there is already a related 6man SRH compression draft(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-comp-rtg-hdr

[spring] Re: [Idr] Request SPRING WG review and comments for draft-liu-idr-sr-segment-list-optimize

Hi Yisong , WG,    I've reviewed your document, and the two issues mentioned are indeed very common. In my opinion, solving these two problems is meaningful and practical, as it can reduce unnecessary bandwidth overhead.   Thanks, Yanrong > From: "Yisong Liu" > Date: Wed, Sep 11, 2024, 16:33 >

[spring] Re: Ask SPRING WG for review draft-liu-spring-sr-policy-flexible-path-selection

Hi Yisong, In my opinion, this draft solves the problems in current practical applications and is meaningful.  >From a practical application perspective, it seems that the application >scenarios may be further expanded. In addition to latency, jitter, and >bandwidth as threshold parameters, addi