Re: [spring] Re： Re: IPR poll - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi Bruno, Thank you for reminding me. I have found my e-mail on the list. Please help to check if it’s available. [spring] Re ： IPR poll - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding (ietf.org) Best Regards

Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?

Hi As an operator, I think the network programming capabilities provided by SRv6 are exactly what we need. Last year SRv6 was deployed for test on China Mobile network in some provinces. There are several solutions now working on header compression to reduce the overhead of message transm

Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?

Hi Zafar I totally agree with you. The CRH solution is more complicated but does not show any more genuine benefits. There is still no use-case document now to provide an understanding of the intended use of CRH. Thanks Yisong 发件人: spring 代表 Zafar Ali (zali) 发送时间: 2020年5月28日 03:19 收件人: