Re: [spring] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, On Aug 23, 2023, at 20:42, Rishabh Parekh wrote: > My point is this draft specifies behavior of a single replication segment > which can be deployed for ingress replication like service (similar to > End.DT2M for Layer 2 BUM) without needing a control plane - either by local > provisioning

[spring] Andrew Alston's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment-17: (with COMMENT)

Andrew Alston has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment-17: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Pl

Re: [spring] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Yes. I can add some text clarifying this. On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 12:23 AM Lars Eggert wrote: > Hi, > > On Aug 23, 2023, at 20:42, Rishabh Parekh wrote: > > My point is this draft specifies behavior of a single replication > segment which can be deployed for ingress replication like service (si