Re: [spring] [Int-area] FW: New Version Notification for draft-raviolli-intarea-trusted-domain-srv6-00.txt

2023-04-02 Thread Andrew Alston - IETF
I would argue rather strongly that the two mechanisms are complementary. I see security mechanisms as additive especially when we are dealing with something that can have such dire security consequences if it goes wrong. As such - neither myself nor the co-authors believe that these mechanisms

[spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-raviolli-intarea-trusted-domain-srv6-01.txt

2023-04-02 Thread Andrew Alston - IETF
Latest version of the draft that aims to address comments received so far has been posted. Comments/reviews appreciated as always. Thanks Andrew A new version of I-D, draft-raviolli-intarea-trusted-domain-srv6-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Andrew Alston and posted to the IETF repo

Re: [spring] [Int-area] FW: New Version Notification for draft-raviolli-intarea-trusted-domain-srv6-00.txt

2023-04-02 Thread Tony Przygienda
On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 10:29 PM Brian E Carpenter < brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tony, > > On 02-Apr-23 05:53, Tony Przygienda wrote: > > ? > > > > I heard the argument that IPv6 address space is large and "easy to carve > up to mean other things" since about as long IPv6 started to gain

Re: [spring] Pending work items on draft-ietf-spring-bfd

2023-04-02 Thread xiao.min2
I agree with Matthew. Note that ZTE has also implemented S-BFD for SR Policy (both SR-MPLS and SRv6). Best Regards, Xiao Min Original From: MatthewBocci(Nokia) To: Greg Mirsky ;Ketan Talaulikar ; Cc: spring ;spring-cha...@ietf.org ; Date: 2023年04月01日 01:23 Subject: Re: [spr