Re: [spring] [ippm] Progressing the PBT-M “Zero Overhead property” draft

2023-01-03 Thread li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com
Hello all, I've read the doc and the discussion in this list. PBT-M is an interesting scheme which will create a lot of requirements for defining new protocols including trigger, metric config, metric export etc. I think we should keep it informational and move it forward ASAP since it is mainl

Re: [spring] [ippm] Progressing the PBT-M “Zero Overhead property” draft

2023-01-03 Thread Haoyu Song
Hi Zhenqiang, Thanks for the support and comments! As for the status of the document, certainly it cannot cover aspects in just one document, but I think the configured data types, and postcard correlation methods can and should be standardized. We could seek a consensus later. For your second

Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment

2023-01-03 Thread Gyan Mishra
+1 Segment Routing has been built for unicast routing for both SR-MPLS and SRv6 flavors - “Unicast SR”. All legacy existing technologies as Jeffrey described MVPN PTAs that exist today can all be used with SR and are fully supported with “Unicast SR”. So there is no rule that legacy MVPN PTA tec

Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment

2023-01-03 Thread Gyan Mishra
RFC 7473 SAC stands for Selective Advertisement Capability. Thanks Gyan On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 2:36 AM Gyan Mishra wrote: > > +1 > > Segment Routing has been built for unicast routing for both SR-MPLS and > SRv6 flavors - “Unicast SR”. > > All legacy existing technologies as Jeffrey described