Re: [spring] Hope to draw the attention of the Working Group：draft-han-spring-srv6-underlay-tunnel-programming-01

Hi Ran, The questions/points raised by Sasha, et all on the thread below also applies to this draft that you have brought up - i.e. how things work when this is modeled as a L1 interface and why not L3. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/IrzGONQP1zXvBHkvmZyaHOEwC68/ Additionally, I am

Re: [spring] [EXTERNAL] Re: RE: My question at the mikeaboutdraft-dong-spring-srv6-inter-layer-programming

Hi Sasha, Thanks a lot for your very useful comments. Please find the following response. 1.(Minor) The draft does not say how the information required for forwarding Layer 3 (IP or MPLS) packets via a Layer 1 path can be obtained and used. It does not even mention that such information is req

Re: [spring] A question about Encapsulation of BFD for SRv6 Policy

Hi Greg, The differences between the SRH of user data and bfd packet: 1. The encapsulations of user data usually include a Service-SID in the SRH, but the encapsulations of BFD does not. 2. In order to make sure the BFD control packet can reach the tail-end, IPv6 address of the ta