Re: [spring] Comments on draft-bocci-mpls-miad-adi-requirements

Hi Greg Thank you for your detailed review and comments. We have tried to address these in the updated draft that we just posted. In answer to your question below about whether the ancillary data needs a common format, I agree that it at least needs a common header format. Regards Matthew F

Re: [spring] Comments on draft-bocci-mpls-miad-adi-requirements

Hi Matthew, thank you for the heads-up. I'll review the updated draft and be back with my notes. Regards, Greg On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:58 AM Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) < matthew.bo...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi Greg > > > > Thank you for your detailed review and comments. We have tried to address

Re: [spring] Comments on draft-bocci-mpls-miad-adi-requirements

Hi Matthew and Stewart, thank you for your work addressing my comments; much appreciated. I have several follow-up questions and comments to the new version of the draft, mostly to the new Section 3.1.2 :