Re: [spring] Fw:New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-01.txt

2020-11-19 Thread 联通集团中国联通研究院-本部
Hi Weiqiang and WG, I read the draft and agree with the requirements specified in it.I think the requirements in Appendix A should be part of the draft in the next version. China Unicom is working on a network evolution plan for SRv6 now, and we have done some field trials based on SRv6.

[spring] Fw:New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-01.txt

2020-11-19 Thread 苏远超(以泰)
Hi Dear Spring WG, This is Yuanchao Su, network architect lead of Alibaba Cloud. We support the requirements in Appendix A should be part of the draft in the next version. Alibaba have been working on SRv6 & uSID for a while, we require all SR-related technology to be standard complied from

Re: [spring] Fw:New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-01.txt

2020-11-19 Thread Ahmed Bashand
I also agree that the requirements in Appendix A should be part of the draft. Having of existing standard as a basis greatly simplifies the development and deployment of any compression scheme Thanks Ahmed On 11/19/20 12:58 AM, Ran Pang(联通集团中国联通研究院-本部) wrote: Hi Weiqiang and WG, I read t

Re: [spring] [ippm] Call for adoption: draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm and draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm

2020-11-19 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Thank you Mach and Tianran for your review comments. Please see inline reply with … From: Mach Chen Date: Thursday, November 19, 2020 at 2:41 AM To: Tianran Zhou , Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) , Greg Mirsky Cc: spring , IPPM Chairs , spring-cha...@ietf.org , Tommy Pauly , IETF IPPM WG (i...@ietf.o

Re: [spring] Fw:New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-01.txt

2020-11-19 Thread Dirk Steinberg
Hello SPRING WG, I have read the SRComp design team requirements draft and would like to comment. I truly believe that a SID compression scheme MUST integrate into the existing SRv6 framework. Otherwise it does not make much sense, or said another way, it will not be a SID compression scheme for

Re: [spring] [ippm] Call for adoption: draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm and draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm

2020-11-19 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Mach, thank you for your email. I've added my understanding of what has been proposed in-line tagged GIM>>. Regards, Greg On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:41 PM Mach Chen wrote: > Hi Tianran, Rakesh and Greg, > > > > Please see some responses inline with [Mach]… > > > > *From:* ippm [mailto:ippm-b

Re: [spring] [ippm] Call for adoption: draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm and draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm

2020-11-19 Thread Tianran Zhou
Hi Mach and Rakesh, Thanks for your reply. I am now much more clear. But I really think the draft should add more text on the motivation and use case. It would be very helpful for the audience to understand. For example, one of my question about the new direct measurement. There is rare word on

Re: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-00.txt

2020-11-19 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Weiqiang, members of the DT, thank you for volunteering your time and expertise to this important for the further development of the SR project. Please find my notes and questions below: - my first question is on the intended scope of the document. As I can understand from the title, abs

Re: [spring] Fw:New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-01.txt

2020-11-19 Thread Stefano Salsano
Il 2020-11-15 16:27, 程伟强 ha scritto: Hi Group, SR compression design team have submitted a new version of compression requirement draft. Main changes as follows: - added 3 items about scalibility with agreement within the design team - added an appendix including 3 items without without una

Re: [spring] Fw:New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-01.txt

2020-11-19 Thread liu.aihua
Hi Weiqiang, Thanks for your new version draft and hard work on DT. I think the SRv6 compression is very important especially for SRv6-TE with heavy overhead. As one of the authors of G-SRv6 draft, I think we should focus on this SRv6 requirements for consensus ASAP. That will be very hel

Re: [spring] Fw:New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-01.txt

2020-11-19 Thread Gaurav Dawra
 +1 - I agree with Dirk and others. The industry has been working on SRv6 for multiple years with technology being quite mature. The requirements listed in the appendix are fully justified from a technical and deployment point of view. I support the requirements based on the SRv6 control plan

Re: [spring] [ippm] Call for adoption: draft-gandhi-ippm-twamp-srpm and draft-gandhi-ippm-stamp-srpm

2020-11-19 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Thanks Tianran for the review comments. We will address the comment in the next revision of the document. Thanks, Rakesh From: Tianran Zhou Date: Thursday, November 19, 2020 at 8:28 PM To: Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) , Mach Chen , Greg Mirsky Cc: spring , IPPM Chairs , spring-cha...@ietf.org ,

Re: [spring] Fw:New Version Notification for draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement-01.txt

2020-11-19 Thread Voyer, Daniel
Hi all, This is quite some progress with the appendix A. I agree with the comments that has been expressed by others in regards of appendix A and its requirements as well as the based assumption with SRv6. I would like to stress on the importance of section 4.1.2 SID summarization. As Dirk ment