[spring] SRV6 OAM (USP SID)

2020-09-14 Thread Rajesh M
When ingress pings a USP SID, at the egress below code is executed. 4.16.2. USP: Ultimate Segment Pop of the SRH The SRH processing of the End, End.X and End.T behaviors are modified: the instruct

Re: [spring] WG adoption call for draft-hegde-spring-node-protection-for-sr-te-paths

2020-09-14 Thread bruno.decraene
Hi Shraddha, Thanks for your reply. Please see inline [Bruno] [/Bruno] From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shraddha Hegde Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 1:43 PM To: DECRAENE Bruno TGI/OLN ; draft-hegde-spring-node-protection-for-sr-te-pa...@ietf.org Cc: spring@ietf.org

Re: [spring] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-17

2020-09-14 Thread Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Hi Brian, Inline. Many thanks! From: Brian Weis Sent: sábado, 5 de septiembre de 2020 1:37 To: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) Cc: sec...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org Subject: Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-sprin

[spring] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-18

2020-09-14 Thread Brian Haberman via Datatracker
Reviewer: Brian Haberman Review result: On the Right Track Section 3 - - - - - - - The abbreviated description of the section is a bit confusing related to FIB lookup. This text: When an SRv6 SID is in the Destination Address field of an IPv6 header of a packet, it is routed through an IPv

Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-mirsky-spring-bfd in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2020-09-14 Thread Greg Mirsky
Dear All, I support the adoption of draft-mirsky-spring-bfd by the SPRING WG for the following reasons: - optional control of the reverse path of the BFD session in SR-MPLS environment; - optional reduction of OAM data exchanged between BFD systems by using the BFD in Demand mode over

Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-mirsky-spring-bfd in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2020-09-14 Thread Jeff Tantsura
I support the adoption as co-author, for the reasons outlined by Greg. Cheers, Jeff On Sep 14, 2020, 2:17 PM -0700, Greg Mirsky , wrote: > Dear All, > I support the adoption of draft-mirsky-spring-bfd by the SPRING WG for the > following reasons: > > • optional control of the reverse path of the

Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-mirsky-spring-bfd in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2020-09-14 Thread Gyan Mishra
I support WG adoption of this well written draft for the reasons outlined by Greg. I wanted to note an orthogonal caveat related to this draft for monitoring of SR-MPLS P2MP P-Tree. RFC 8562 and RFC 8563 relates to mLDP PTA P-Tree, however in a pure SR-MPLS environment where LDP has been elimina

Re: [spring] SRV6 OAM (USP SID)

2020-09-14 Thread Rajesh M
Please respond. Juniper Business Use Only From: spring On Behalf Of Rajesh M Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 3:06 PM To: Zafar Ali (zali) ; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) Cc: G. Sri Karthik Goud ; SPRING WG ; Deepti Rathi Subject: [spring] SRV6 OAM (USP SID) [Exte

Re: [spring] SRV6 OAM (USP SID)

2020-09-14 Thread G. Sri Karthik Goud
Reframing the question: * Does the draft(oam/network programming) talk about supporting OAM functionality for END/END.X sids with USP/PSP flag set? * If it does, can you please point out to the relevant portion? Why isn't it explicitly stated like it is for USD and other END.D* Sids?

Re: [spring] SRV6 OAM (USP SID)

2020-09-14 Thread Zafar Ali (zali)
Hi Rajesh, The extension header chain is processed as defined in RFC8200. If you get to the upper layer header, it is indeed processed as per section 4.1.1. This is no different than any other behavior, hence there is no reason to call this out explicitly on this one and not the others. Thank

Re: [spring] SRV6 OAM (USP SID)

2020-09-14 Thread Rajesh M
Thanks Zafar. Got the clarification. Juniper Business Use Only From: Zafar Ali (zali) Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 7:34 AM To: Rajesh M ; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) Cc: G. Sri Karthik Goud ; Deepti Rathi ; SPRING WG ; Zafar Ali (zali) Subject: Re: SRV6 OAM

Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-mirsky-spring-bfd instate "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2020-09-14 Thread liu.aihua
I support WG adoption this draft since it enables the use of BFD Demand mode that reduces amount of BFD control messages received by the ingress BFD system. Regards, Aihua 原始邮件 发件人:GregMirsky 收件人:IETF Secretariat ; 抄送人:spring ;spring-cha...@ietf.org ;draft-mirsky-spring-...@iet