Hi Bruno,
Thanks for the review and comments.
Pls see inline for replies.
Juniper Business Use Only
From: bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 8:47 PM
To: draft-hegde-spring-node-protection-for-sr-te-pa...@ietf.org
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [spring] WG adoption c
Pablo,
Assume the following packet:
* Destination address is a uSID container
* Next header is an SRH
In this case, you wouldn't process the SRH until you process every uSID in the
uSID container. Do I have this much right?
So, if any uSID in the container specified the PSP or USP fla
In this case, you wouldn't process the SRH until you process every uSID in the
uSID container. Do I have this much right?
Perfect
So, if any uSID in the container specified the PSP or USP flavor, you would
delete an SRH that has not yet been processed.
PSP or USP wont come into picture untill D
Jeff
I am in agreement that drop should be the default behavior in this case
where ldp is broken and unable to forward due to unlabeled fec.
As of the last many years most vendors and best practice of any MPLS
implementations is to have knobs to change the default behavior. That
being said you w
