Dear WG,
I don't support WG adoption.
It is not a new idea for each Virtual Network to have its own SIDs.
e.g. The earlist description of the SID be allocated per flex-algorithm and
related metric
information was in draft-hegdeppsenak-isis-sr-flex-algo-00(2017.7.17) (now is
draft-ietf-i
(Though it is in a PIM WG draft (cc’ed), but the terminologies in RFC8402 are
used and are the key to understand, so I would expect points from the SPRING
WG).
Hi Rishabh,
Thanks for your response!
Let me try to understand the applicability of SRv6 first, and move to the other
points afterwa
Hi Ran,
Thanks for your comments. While I don’t quite get your point of objection.
Perhaps you have some misunderstanding about the relationship of the drafts
mentioned.
RFC 8402 introduced the topology and service semantics of SR SID, this document
proposed to add resource semantics to SIDs.
Support
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 13, 2020, at 8:38 AM, James Guichard
> wrote:
>
>
> Dear WG:
>
> This email begins a 2 week WG adoption call for
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang/ ending
> Monday 27th July 2020.
>
> Please speak up if you support
Jingrong,
Your understanding is essentially correct. Think of a Replication function
at a node represented by the function portion of SRV6 SID with Replication
context either in arg or in the function itself. In the simplest case,as
you illustrated, replication to a downstream node is just construc
Dear Bruno Decraene,
The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled.
Below is the scheduled session information followed by
the original request.
spring Session 1 (1:40 requested)
Monday, 27 July 2020, Session I 1100-1240
Room Name: Room 3 size: 3
---
