Hi Joel,
Thanks for your reply and comment.
The bullet list in section 4 was introduced before the TEAS NS design team,
while I understand that it is related to the topic under discussion in the
design team. Perhaps we could reduce such description in this document and
leave the details for
Thank you Jie. Yes, I think it would help to do what you describe,
reducing those discussions in this document.
Yours,
Joel
On 6/23/2020 3:08 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote:
Hi Joel,
Thanks for your reply and comment.
The bullet list in section 4 was introduced before the TEAS NS design team,
w
Support
Gaurav
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 22, 2020, at 7:46 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hi SPRING WG,
>
> Authors of draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment [1] have asked for WG
> adoption.
>
> Please indicate your support, comments, or objection, for adopting this draft
I support
-- CH
On 2020-06-22, 7:45 AM, "spring-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of
bruno.decra...@orange.com" wrote:
Hi SPRING WG,
Authors of draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment [1] have asked for WG
adoption.
Please indicate your support, comments, or objection, for adopti
All
SR-MPLS utilizes IPv4 data plane and and can service v4 v6 edges 6to4
softwire mesh framework from the VPN overlay aspect.
Can SR-MPLS use IPV6 data plane?
Reason why I am asking is that it is very simple to get from LDPv4 core to
SR-MPLS core.
However if you have an existing brown field S
Support the adoption.
Best,
Ehsan
> On Jun 22, 2020, at 7:45 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hi SPRING WG,
>
> Authors of draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment [1] have asked for WG
> adoption.
>
> Please indicate your support, comments, or objection, for adopting this draft
>
Dear SPRING WG:
This email starts a two week WG LC for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/.
Substantive comments should be directed to the mailing list no later than July
7th. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors.
Thanks!
Jim, Joel & Bruno
Support as co-author
Cheers,
Jeff
On Jun 23, 2020, 10:59 AM -0700, James Guichard
, wrote:
> Dear SPRING WG:
>
> This email starts a two week WG LC for
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/.
>
> Substantive comments should be directed to the mailing list no later than
>
Support as co-author.
Thanks,
Acee
From: spring on behalf of James Guichard
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 1:59 PM
To: "spring@ietf.org"
Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [spring] WG LC
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/
Dear SPRING WG:
This email starts a tw
Gyan,
You can signal SR-MPLS over a network that has IPv6 enabled, but does not have
IPv4 enabled.
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
From: spring On Behalf Of Gyan Mishra
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:20 PM
To: SPRING WG
Subject: [spring] Spr
Thanks Ron!
Gyan
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:51 PM Ron Bonica wrote:
> Gyan,
>
>
>
> You can signal SR-MPLS over a network that has IPv6 enabled, but does not
> have IPv4 enabled.
>
>
>
>Ron
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> *From:*
Gyan,
In SR-MPLS, either over IPv4 or IPv6 the data-plane is MPLS (rfc8660)
If MPLS is tunneled over IP, e.g MPLS over GRE, MPLS over UDP, etc, then
data-plane is that of outer encapsulation - rfc8663 as the best example, e.g
outer header would be IPv4/IPv6+UDP
Since bindings (SIDs) need to be d
support.
Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)
Dear SPRING WG:
This email starts a two week WG LC for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/.
Substantive comments should be directed to the mailing list no later than July
7th. Editorial suggestions can be sent to
Support.
Best Regards,
Shunwan
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 1:59 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG LC
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/
Dear SPRING WG:
Jeff,
I'm not sure that is what Gyan was asking. He can clarify.
I think Gyan was asking about an environment where:
* SR-MPLS runs directly over ethernet. SR-MPLS is not encapsulated in IP or
UDP over IP
* The SR-MPLS signaling protocol (IS-IS or OSPFv3) does not required IPv4
to be
Support.
Best Regards,
Ran
原始邮件
发件人：JamesGuichard
收件人：spring@ietf.org ;
抄送人：spring-cha...@ietf.org ;
日 期 ：2020年06月24日 01:59
主 题 ：[spring] WG LChttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/
___
spring mailin
I support the adoption.
Best regards,
Shuping
From: James Guichard [mailto:james.n.guich...@futurewei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 1:59 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: WG LC https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/
Dear SPRING WG:
This email
Yes, support.
Best Regards
Xuesong
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 1:59 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG LC
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/
Dear SPRING WG:
Support! We are anxious to begin working on the related p2mp-policy draft over
in pim.
mike
-Original Message-
From: spring On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 7:46 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG adoption call for draft-voyer-spring-sr-replica
Yes, support.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 1:59 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG LC
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/
Dear SPRING WG:
Th
Thanks Jeff
I was looking for just vanilla SR-MPLS support natively using IPV6 data
plane.
After reading a bit I confirmed below that both address families IPv4 and
IPv6 data planes are supported with SR-MPLS.
That is exactly what I was looking for.
When reading RFC 8402 Segment Routing Archit
21 matches
Mail list logo
