Ack, thanks Ron for clarifying!
Cheers,
Melchior
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 4:55 PM Ron Bonica wrote:
> Hi Melchior,
>
>
>
> These words are intentionally lower-case and do not carry RFC 2119 or 8174
> weight.
>
>
>
> In fact, you won’t see any RFC 2119 language, IANA requests or packet
> formats
WG,
it's been more than a month since the e-mail below.
In the meantime there were few updates. These updates cover the
resolution of Brian's (v11 and finally v12) and Joel's (v13 and finally
v15) concerns, plus some other minor changes.
Also, there were other comments:
- on the relation with
Martin,
Since myself - and others still believe the consensus call was fundamentally
flawed and a violation of process - we actually welcome this continuing so that
we can finally officially lodge the prepared appeals. Thank you for this
Thanks
Andrew
From: spring On Behalf Of Martin Vigou
Bruno Decraene has requested publication of
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-15 as Proposed Standard on behalf of
the SPRING working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming/
On 14/4/20 09:16, Martin Vigoureux wrote:
WG,
it's been more than a month since the e-mail below.
In the meantime there were few updates. These updates cover the
resolution of Brian's (v11 and finally v12) and Joel's (v13 and finally
v15) concerns, plus some other minor changes.
So, procedur
