Hi Bruno,
Thank you. Both proposed changes look good to me.
I will also update draft-ietf-6man-SRH... to RFC8754.
Cheers,
Pablo.
From: "bruno.decra...@orange.com"
Date: Friday, 13 March 2020 at 17:27
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" , "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-
The following are some observations on SRv6 SIDs and IPv6 addressing as they
pertain to draft-ietf-spring-network-programming (NETPGM)
SRv6 RFCs tell us the following as it relates to SRv6 SIDs, IPv6 addresses and
how SIDs are identified and assigned:
- RFC8402 tells us an SRv6 SID is an IPv6 ad
Hi,
> How this relates to NETPGM
> - SRv6 SIDs are IPv6 addresses.
> - SRv6 SIDs are not necessarily interface addresses.
This will need some work, because according to
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#section-2.1: "IPv6 addresses of all types
are assigned to interfaces, not nodes.". I think
Darren, I had assumed that 8754 did indeed define things the way you use
them. However, I can not find the assertions you make.
The short text in section 3.3 of RFC 6754 does not seem to create a
distinction between segment or local interface. For that to be the
justification for SIDs do not
Hi Joel,
Please check revision 13 of this document that clarifies the PSP section.
About your last point:
For both SR-MPLS and SRv6, there are restrictions on the path to be used, in
particular:
- the SR policy may only use SIDs instantiated on SR Endpoints.
- When computing the SR policy, there
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking WG of the
IETF.
Title : SRv6 Network Programming
Authors : Clarence Filsfils
Pablo Cam
The changes in section 4.16.1 do improve the clarity.
Having said that, the text about motivating PSP reads:
PSP allows, for example, for an egress PE to receive a packet
with a segment in the DA of the outer header without any need to
process the SRH.
is a very weak and confusing exp
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, 04:39 Sander Steffann, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > How this relates to NETPGM
> > - SRv6 SIDs are IPv6 addresses.
> > - SRv6 SIDs are not necessarily interface addresses.
>
> This will need some work, because according to
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#section-2.1: "IPv6 addres
Hi all,
We have submitted a new revision of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming.
This update only changes the references section of the draft. Particularly
- Corrected Ethernet reference to IEEE 802.3
- RFC6437 moved from informative to normative
- Updated draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-h
