Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

doption call on draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding and we are not adopting it. Best regards, Joel, Jim, Bruno Orange Restricted From: spring On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 12:17 PM To: SPRING WG Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call -

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 6:17 AM To: SPRING WG Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Dear WG, Thank you for all comments received during this WG last call and for the detailed review of the document. In term

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Dear WG, Thank you for all comments received during this WG last call and for the detailed review of the document. In term of requirement, there is support for the need to protect SR-Policy traffic from node failure both: a) for the protection/FRR duration (from failure detection to the start o

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

m>> Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 11:25 PM To: Huaimo Chen mailto:huaimo.c...@futurewei.com>> Cc: Bruno Decraene mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>>; SPRING WG mailto:spring@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwardin

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

reg Mirsky > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 8, 2022 11:25 PM > *To:* Huaimo Chen > *Cc:* Bruno Decraene ; SPRING WG < > spring@ietf.org> > *Subject:* Re: [spring] WG adoption call - > draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding > > Hi Huaimo, > thank you for the exp

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 2:48 AM To: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET ; draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forward...@ietf.org Cc: SPRING WG Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Hi Bruno, Thank you very much for your valuable comments

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

: SPRING WG Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Hi Bruno, Thank you very much for your valuable comments. My responses/explanations are inline below with [HC]. Best Regards, Huaimo on behalf of co-authors

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

om>> Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 4:38 PM To: Bruno Decraene mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>> Cc: SPRING WG mailto:spring@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Dear Authors, et al., I've read the draft and would

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

to:slitkows.i...@gmail.com>; 'SPRING WG' mailto:spring@ietf.org>>; Huzhibo mailto:huzh...@huawei.com>> Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi authors of both documents, WG,

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

*Cc:* SPRING WG > *Subject:* Re: [spring] WG adoption call - > draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding > > Dear Authors, et al., > I've read the draft and would appreciate it if the authors can clarify one > question: > >- What do you consider as the significant

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

: SPRING WG Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Dear Authors, et al., I've read the draft and would appreciate it if the authors can clarify one question: * What do you consider as the significant advantage of the mechanism defined in

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi Bruno, Thank you very much for your valuable comments. My responses/explanations are inline below with [HC]. Best Regards, Huaimo on behalf of co-authors From: bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 6:01 AM To: draft-hu-spring-segme

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Dear Authors, et al., I've read the draft and would appreciate it if the authors can clarify one question: - What do you consider as the significant advantage of the mechanism defined in your draft compared with the mechanism defined in draft-ietf-spring-segment-protection-sr-te-paths? A

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

[speaking as WG contributor] Hi authors, all I have some comments specific to the binding SID aspect. §2 " For a binding segment of a possible failed node, the node advertises the information about the binding segment, including the binding SID and the list of SIDs associated with the b

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

rsday, February 3, 2022 10:35 PM To: bruno.decra...@orange.com; 'SPRING WG' Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi Bruno, Thank you very much for your valuable comments. My responses/explanati

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

raddha Juniper Business Use Only From: spring On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Wednesday, February 2, 2022 6:56 PM To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; 'SPRING WG' ; Huzhibo Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding [External

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

AM To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com ; 'SPRING WG' ; Huzhibo Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Hi authors of both documents, WG, [Speaking as individual contributor.] It’s good to see technical discussions on the restoration of f

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

ultiple SPFs (cf "2)") * Benefit from the signaling of the proxy (cf "1)") Thanks, Regards, --Bruno Orange Restricted From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 6:13 PM To: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET ; 'SPRING WG' Subject: RE: [spring] WG adop

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

618192287 Email: huzh...@huawei.com 发件人：slitkows.ietf 收件人：Huzhibo ;bruno.decraene ;'SPRING WG' 时 间：2022-01-31 21:06:57 主 题：RE: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding [HZB2]First: This document does not require that all affected traffic be direct

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

sary, so the gain is questionable and not really measurable. From: Huzhibo Sent: vendredi 28 janvier 2022 10:57 To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bruno.decra...@orange.com; 'SPRING WG' Subject: RE: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

G WG' Subject: RE: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Hi, [SLI2] To get FRR working, no choice, all the nodes must support the extension. ... [HC]: When some nodes (not all) support the extension, FRR may work for some failures. [SLI3]: M

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

no.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com> mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>>; SPRING WG mailto:spring@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding WG, I don’t support the adoption of this document as

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Please see inline. From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com [mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 28, 2022 4:58 PM To: Huzhibo ; bruno.decra...@orange.com; 'SPRING WG' Subject: RE: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Hi [HZB2]F

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>; SPRING WG mailto:spring@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding WG, I don’t support the adoption of this document as a WG document. I am in agreement with stephane’s comments on the

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

'SPRING WG' Subject: RE: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com <mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com> [mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 28, 2022 1:41 AM To: Huzhibo mailto:huzh...@huawei.com>

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

This document provides a comprehensive SR-TE node failure protection solution. I think it is useful for SR network reliability. B.R. Lijie Deng 网络技术研究所-邓丽洁 18922187259 deng...@chinatelecom.cn From: bruno.decra...@orange.com Date: 2022-01-13 18:19 To: SPRING WG Subject: [spring] WG adoption cal

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

lease see inline. Thanks Zhibo Hu From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shraddha Hegde Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 3:15 PM To: bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>; SPRING WG mailto:spring@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption ca

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

a...@orange.com; 'SPRING WG' Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Hi Stephane, Thank you for your comments. [SLI2] To get FRR working, no choice, all the nodes must support the extension. ... [HC]: When some no

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

dha Hegde Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 3:15 PM To: bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>; SPRING WG mailto:spring@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding WG, I don’t support the adoption of this

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

: bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com> mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>>; SPRING WG mailto:spring@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding WG, I don't support the adoption of this do

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

spring@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding WG, I don’t support the adoption of this document as a WG document. I am in agreement with stephane’s comments on the list. 1. May cause congestion somewhere else in the netw

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com [mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 28, 2022 1:41 AM To: Huzhibo ; bruno.decra...@orange.com; 'SPRING WG' Subject: RE: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Hi, [SLI] Your statement is purely t

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

behalf of slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 12:40 PM To: 'Huzhibo' ; bruno.decra...@orange.com ; 'SPRING WG' Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Hi, [SLI] Your statement is purely theoreti

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

ption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding WG, I don’t support the adoption of this document as a WG document. I am in agreement with stephane’s comments on the list. 1. May cause congestion somewhere else in the network There is already WG adopted docume

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

To: Huzhibo mailto:huzh...@huawei.com> >; bruno.decra...@orange.com <mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com> ; 'SPRING WG' mailto:spring@ietf.org> > Subject: RE: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Hi, Please find more inline. From

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi Shraddha: Thanks for your comments, Please see inline. Thanks Zhibo Hu From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shraddha Hegde Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 3:15 PM To: bruno.decra...@orange.com; SPRING WG Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

WG, I don't support the adoption of this document as a WG document. I am in agreement with stephane's comments on the list. 1. May cause congestion somewhere else in the network There is already WG adopted document that is addressing the problem space draft-ietf-spring-segment-protection-sr

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi, Please find more inline. From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com [mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 4:54 PM To: Huzhibo ; bruno.decra...@orange.com; 'SPRING WG' Subject: RE: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding H

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi, Please find more inline. From: Huzhibo Sent: mercredi 26 janvier 2022 09:31 To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bruno.decra...@orange.com; 'SPRING WG' Subject: RE: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Hi slitkows : Thanks for you

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi slitkows : Thanks for your comments, Please see inline. Thanks Zhibo Hu From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 1:13 AM To: bruno.decra...@orange.com; 'SPRING WG' Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call -

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi, I'm NOT supporting this draft for the following reasons: 1. The WG already have a WG document which is dealing with this problem, I don't think that WG should come with multiple documents/solutions for the same solution space as it may just confuse the industry and create deploymen

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi WG, I support its adoption as a co-author. It Provides a complete FRR mechanism for SR-TE Node/Link/Binding Sid failure. Including before IGP convergence, and after IGP convergence to before TE convergence. Best Regards, Junda Yao From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi WG, I've read this document and support its adoption. Best regards, Jie From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 6:19 PM To: SPRING WG Subject: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-for

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi, All: I have read this draft and support its adoption. It can provide the restoration of the routes to an adjacency segment, a node segment and a binding segment of the path when one proxied node failures.. Best Regards Aijun Wang China Telecom From: spring-boun...@ietf.org On

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi WG I Support the adoption. thanks. 发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 bruno.decra...@orange.com 发送时间: 2022年1月13日 18:19 收件人: SPRING WG 主题: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Dear WG, This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call, e

Re: [spring] WG adoption call -draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi WG， I support this adoption. Best Regards, Liyan Gong 邮件原文发件人："bruno.decraene" 收件人：SPRING WG 抄　送: (无)发送时间：2022-01-13 18:19:20主题：[spring] WG adoption call -draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Dear WG, This message starts a 2 week WG adoption c

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi all, I support this adoption. The draft is completed and useful. Best regards, Haojie Wang ChinaMobile wanghao...@chinamobile.com From: bruno.decra...@orange.com Date: 2022-01-13 18:19 To: SPRING WG Subject: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-for

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

I support the adoption. Best Regards, Weiqiang Cheng _ From: spring on behalf of bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 5:19 AM To: SPRING WG Subject: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Dear WG, This messag

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Support for WG adoption. Thanks, - Xufeng Virus-free. www.avast.com

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi Folks, Happy new year! I support this adoption. Proxy mode is a kind of common way to solve a group of failure restoration problem, that is the advantage. BR， 杨锋 Feng Yang 发件人: bruno.decraene 时间: 2022/01/13(星期四)18:19 收件人: SPRING WG

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi All， I support the adoption. Best, Meiling From: bruno.decra...@orange.com Date: 2022-01-13 18:19 To: SPRING WG Subject: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Dear WG, This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call, ending 27/01/2022, for draft-hu-sp

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

I support the adoption of this draft. Thanks. B.R. Yongqing Zhu zhu...@chinatelecom.cn From: bruno.decra...@orange.com Date: 2022-01-13 18:19 To: SPRING WG Subject: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Dear WG, This message starts a 2 week WG adoption

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi WG， I support the adoption. Regards, Peng Liu liupeng...@outlook.com From: bruno.decra...@orange.com Date: 2022-01-13 18:19 To: SPRING WG Subject: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Dear WG, This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call, ending

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

I support the adoption. Best, Haoyu From: spring On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 2:19 AM To: SPRING WG Subject: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding Dear WG, This message starts a 2 week WG adoption call, ending

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi WG, I support its adoption as author. It provides a complete FRR mechanism for SR-TE Node/Link/Binding Sid failure. Including before IGP convergence,and after IGP convergence to before TE convergence. Best Regards, Zhibo Hu From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of br

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

I have read the draft and support WG adoption of this draft. SR provides local protection only via TI-LFA at the PLR node but does not provide bypass loop NNH node protection around the failure. This draft provides a Midpoint protection mechanism using a new proxy forwarding IGP extension capabi

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Support WG adoption. Linda Dunbar From: spring mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of bruno.decra...@orange.com mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 5:19 AM To: SPRING WG mailto:spring@ietf.org>> Subject: [spring] WG adop

Re: [spring] WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding

Hi Everyone, Happy New Year! I support its adoption. It provides protections for a node SID, adjacency SID and binding SID of SR-MPLS TE path after the IGP converges. Best Regards, Huaimo as co-author From: spring on behalf of bruno.decra...@orange.com