al Message-
From: Joel Halpern
Sent: 14 October 2022 13:56
To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'SPRING WG List'
Subject: Re: [spring] SPRING WG Implementation Information Policy
We removed all references to retaining the material in the published
RFC. And emphasized that we are following
carried in RFCs. I think you could
safely change both occurrences to "the draft" and I would then shut up and go
and do some real work.
Cheers,
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Joel Halpern
Sent: 14 October 2022 13:56
To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'SPRING WG List'
S
We removed all references to retaining the material in the published
RFC. And emphasized that we are following RFC 7942, being explicit
about where we are varying from it. This is to align with the rough
consensus of the WG not to retain the material in RFCs.
If we put in text about not reta
Hi Joel, chairs.
Thanks for working on this.
Can I ask, just for clarification, what the conclusion is on whether this
section is going to remain in the document when it becomes an RFC. I find the
text a little confusing because it talks about "an I-D [that] is ready for WG
last call", but lat
