final endpoint (e.g., End.DX4, End.DT6) behaviors. These capabilities are
> factored in by an SR Source Node (or a controller) during the SR Policy
> computation.
>...
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Halpern Direct
> Sent: martes, 17 de marzo de
020 18:51
To: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-12
Given that the requirement to be able to ignore the routing header predates any
of the SRv6 work, a natural reading would be that ignoring the header is
som
(or a controller) during the SR Policy computation.
...
-Original Message-
From: Joel Halpern Direct
Sent: martes, 17 de marzo de 2020 18:51
To: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-12
Given th
Hi,
>>Having said that, the text about motivating PSP reads:
>> PSP allows, for example, for an egress PE to receive a packet
>> with a segment in the DA of the outer header without any need to
>> process the SRH.
>>is a very weak and confusing explanation. Given
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions).
>
> Regards,
> Pablo.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Joel M. Halpern"
> Date: Tuesday, 10 March 2020 at 19:26
> To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)"
> Cc:
Inline
-Original Message-
From: "Joel M. Halpern"
Date: Monday, 16 March 2020 at 20:23
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)"
Cc: "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-12
The changes in section
. (for
SRv6, see section 4 of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions).
Regards,
Pablo.
-Original Message-
From: "Joel M. Halpern"
Date: Tuesday, 10 March 2020 at 19:26
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)"
Cc: "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on
t 19:26
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)"
Cc: "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-12
Pablo, in your reply below you say that the text in 8200 is "crystal
clear". It requires an interesting lens to find so
pcamaril)
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 12:10 AM
To: Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai) ; Christian
Hopps
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-12
Hi Wang Weibin,
What is the benefit to ignore and keep processing to get to the same end res
subsection 4.1.1.
Cheers!
Wang Weibin
From: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 12:10 AM
To: Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai) ; Christian
Hopps
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-12
Hi Wang Weibin,
What is
nghai)"
Date: Thursday, 12 March 2020 at 14:21
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" , Christian Hopps
Cc: "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: RE: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-12
Hi Pablo and Chris:
In my understanding, and avoiding the ambiguous
: Christian Hopps
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-12
Inline. This one is short.
Many thanks,
Pablo.
-Original Message-
From: Christian Hopps mailto:cho...@chopps.org>>
Date: Thursday, 12 March 2020 at 13:08
To:
Inline. This one is short.
Many thanks,
Pablo.
-Original Message-
From: Christian Hopps
Date: Thursday, 12 March 2020 at 13:08
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)"
Cc: Christian Hopps , "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-ne
acket).
>
> Many thanks,
> Pablo.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Hopps
> Date: Wednesday, 11 March 2020 at 20:21
> To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)"
> Cc: Christian Hopps , "spring@ietf.org"
> Subject: Re: [spring] Question
: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) ; Christian
Hopps
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-12
Pablo, Chris and all,
I have not found the restriction for Binding SID not being the last SID in the
SID list in RFC 8402 or RFC 8666.
And I think
To: Christian Hopps
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-12
Hi Chris,
The Binding SIDs have a restriction not to be the last SID in a SID list. This
applies to all three Binding SID behaviors defined in
draft-ietf-spring-network
-
From: Christian Hopps
Date: Wednesday, 11 March 2020 at 20:21
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)"
Cc: Christian Hopps , "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-12
> On Mar 11, 2020, at 2:44 PM, P
;t seem like a reasonable restriction.
Thanks,
Chris.
>
> Many thanks,
> Pablo.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Hopps
> Date: Wednesday, 11 March 2020 at 17:08
> To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)"
> Cc: Christian Hopps , "spring@ietf.org&q
there's no SRH.
Many thanks,
Pablo.
-Original Message-
From: Christian Hopps
Date: Wednesday, 11 March 2020 at 17:08
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)"
Cc: Christian Hopps , "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programmi
> Pablo.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Hopps
> Date: Wednesday, 11 March 2020 at 12:06
> To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)"
> Cc: Christian Hopps , "spring@ietf.org"
> Subject: Re: [spring] Question on
> draft-ietf-spring-srv
l: +972-549266302
Email: alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com
-Original Message-
From: spring On Behalf Of Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 2:17 PM
To: Christian Hopps
Cc: spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-prog
r, you process it as per 4.1.1
Thank you,
Pablo.
-Original Message-
From: Christian Hopps
Date: Wednesday, 11 March 2020 at 12:06
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)"
Cc: Christian Hopps , "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-s
atch
>
> Section 4:
>> Each FIB entry indicates the behavior associated with a SID instance
>> and its parameters.
>
> Thank you,
> Pablo.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Hopps
> Date: Tuesday, 10 March 2020 at 22:01
> To: "Pabl
meters.
Thank you,
Pablo.
-Original Message-
From: Christian Hopps
Date: Tuesday, 10 March 2020 at 22:01
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)"
Cc: Christian Hopps , "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [spring] Question on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-12
> On Mar 10, 2020, at 2:13 PM, Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks for going through the document.
> The behaviors 4.13 (End.B6.Encaps), 4.14 (End.B6.Encaps.Red) and 4.15
> (End.BM) correspond to Binding SIDs [1].
>
> As a result of 4.13 for example, the packet is e
Pablo, in your reply below you say that the text in 8200 is "crystal
clear". It requires an interesting lens to find something "crystal
clear" about which so many people have expressed so much disagreement.
While a lawyer may claim to a judge that text in a contract is crystal
clear, it is alm
Hi Chris,
Thanks for going through the document.
The behaviors 4.13 (End.B6.Encaps), 4.14 (End.B6.Encaps.Red) and 4.15 (End.BM)
correspond to Binding SIDs [1].
As a result of 4.13 for example, the packet is encapsulated with a new IPv6
header and an SRH that contains the SR policy associated to
27 matches
Mail list logo
