Re: [spring] [bess] [Pals] [EXTERNAL] Re: Martini Pseudowires and SR

Hi Christian I reviewed both PLE draft and I believe this PLE draft will be very helpful for operators migrating to SR-MPLS or SRv6 and need a way to support CES PWE3 T-LDP signaling over EVPN VPWS. I support progressing the draft. Thanks Gyan On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 1:34 AM Christian Schmutzer

Re: [spring] [bess] [Pals] [EXTERNAL] Re: Martini Pseudowires and SR

Hi Susan Thanks for the heads up. I will look out for the WG LC in IDR and BESS. Kind Regards Gyan On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:40 PM Susan Hares wrote: > Gyan: > > > > IDR WG have also adopted > > > > draft-ietf-idr-sr-p2mp-policy-00 >

Re: [spring] [bess] [Pals] [EXTERNAL] Re: Martini Pseudowires and SR

Gyan: IDR WG have also adopted draft-ietf-idr-sr-p2mp-policy-00 Jeffrey Zhang has joined as co-author. Work is undergoing in the author group To help align it to other work. It will be WG LC in IDR and BESS. Cheers, Sue From: B

Re: [spring] [bess] [Pals] [EXTERNAL] Re: Martini Pseudowires and SR

Regarding feature gaps, I’d like to point to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zzhang-pals-pw-for-ip-udp-payload-01 for a new kind of PW. I had not got to socialize it in PALS/MPLS WG and will fill in the signaling details in the next revision (yes, EVPN-VPWS type of signaling is what

Re: [spring] [bess] [Pals] [EXTERNAL] Re: Martini Pseudowires and SR

On 01.06.2022, at 09:42, Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz) mailto:cschm...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi, After the initial hype for PWE3 in the early 2000s we have seen renewed interest in circuit emulation (TDM PWE3) in 2015 as there was (and still is) a lot of PDH and SONET/SDH infrastructure out th

Re: [spring] [bess] [Pals] [EXTERNAL] Re: Martini Pseudowires and SR

Hi, After the initial hype for PWE3 in the early 2000s we have seen renewed interest in circuit emulation (TDM PWE3) in 2015 as there was (and still is) a lot of PDH and SONET/SDH infrastructure out there that operators can’t get rid of fast enough while those products go end of life. We have

Re: [spring] [bess] [Pals] [EXTERNAL] Re: Martini Pseudowires and SR

+1 Jorge at all. I don’t foresee significant additions to RFC 8214, most legacy PALS stuff doesn’t need to be resurrected.  However - If there’s appetite for IGP extensions for signaling PW (in spirit of SR)) and  (rather than using LDP)  there’s that – “Method and apparatus for pseudo-wire setup a

Re: [spring] [bess] [Pals] [EXTERNAL] Re: Martini Pseudowires and SR

+ 1 to Sasha and Jorge The feature gaps to be addressed in BGP EVPN VPWS should be based on operators' feedback so we add only those that are relevant. Thanks, Ketan On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 4:59 PM Alexander Vainshtein < alexander.vainsht...@rbbn.com> wrote: > Jorge and all, > > Here is a (adm