[spring] draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr

Hi Andrew, WG, FYI, I have just updated the shepherd write up [1] with the following two modifications: - change of AD in the Personnel section (from Martin to Andrew) - updating section 7 (IPR disclosures from authors) to reflect the recent email from Syed [2] --Bruno [1] https://datatracker

[spring] draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr

Hi authors, Following yet another reading, please find below one proposed comment. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr#section-5.2 "the processing is the same as that specified by [RFC8754] section

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr

bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 11:26 PM To: spring@ietf.org; draft-ietf-spring-nsh...@ietf.org Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr Hi authors, WG, Authors of draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr have asked for WG last call. Before initiating it, I’ve done a review of the

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr

We will work on these comments. On the downref, when we did the IETF LC for what became RFC 8300, we explicitly included the downref to 7665. There is a standard IETF procedure for that case. In this case, we will look to see if 8300 would be a better reference. At first glance, it would.

[spring] draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr

Hi authors, WG, Authors of draft-ietf-spring-nsh-sr have asked for WG last call. Before initiating it, I've done a review of the draft as document shepherd. Please find below some comments. --- It's not crystal clear to me what the scope and the goal of the document are. - From the abst