Hi Yingzhen,
Thanks for your reply, snipping to the open items -
>
> You're correct that SRv6 YANG should be augmenting segment-routing like
> sr-mpls. This was the agreement between SRv6 and SR-MPLS YANG authors.
> Hopefully SRv6 YANG authors will update so in the next revision.
>
I would al
s Guichard , "spring@ietf.org"
Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [spring] WG LC
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/
Resent-From:
Hi,
1. The YANG model would benefit having references for various leaf-nodes
2. Need validated examples,
Hi Dhruv,
Thank you for your review and comments.
You're correct that SRv6 YANG should be augmenting segment-routing like
sr-mpls. This was the agreement between SRv6 and SR-MPLS YANG authors.
Hopefully SRv6 YANG authors will update so in the next revision.
I've uploaded version -17 to addres
Hi WG,
I guess it is still 7th in some part of the earth and hoping I am not
too late :)
I find it weird that the SRv6 Yang
[https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raza-spring-srv6-yang-05] does not
use/augment ietf-segment-routing or ietf-segment-routing-common. A
sync up between these modules will b
datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/
Dear SPRING WG:
This email starts a two week WG LC for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/.
Substantive comments should be directed to the mailing list no later than July
7th. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the au
quot;spring-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [spring] WG LC
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/
Dear SPRING WG:
This email starts a two week WG LC for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/.
Substantive comments should be directed to the mailing list no
Yes, support.
Best regards,
Jie
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 1:59 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG LC
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/
Dear SPRING WG
Yes, support.
Best Regards
Xuesong
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 1:59 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG LC
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/
Dear SPRING WG
I support the adoption.
Best regards,
Shuping
From: James Guichard [mailto:james.n.guich...@futurewei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 1:59 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: WG LC https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/
Dear SPRING WG:
This email
Support.
Best Regards,
Shunwan
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 1:59 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG LC
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/
Dear SPRING WG
Support as co-author.
Thanks,
Acee
From: spring on behalf of James Guichard
Date: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 1:59 PM
To: "spring@ietf.org"
Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [spring] WG LC
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/
Dear SPRING WG:
Support as co-author
Cheers,
Jeff
On Jun 23, 2020, 10:59 AM -0700, James Guichard
, wrote:
> Dear SPRING WG:
>
> This email starts a two week WG LC for
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/.
>
> Substantive comments should be directed to the mailing list no later than
>
Dear SPRING WG:
This email starts a two week WG LC for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang/.
Substantive comments should be directed to the mailing list no later than July
7th. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors.
Thanks!
Jim, Joel & Bruno
13 matches
Mail list logo
