Re: [spring] SR Policy: per-SL reverse

2021-11-16 Thread Boris Hassanov
-Original Message- From: Joel M. Halpern Sent: Friday, November 12, 2021 10:53 PM To: Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) ; SPRING WG Cc: Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) ; Chengli (Cheng Li) Subject: Re: [spring] SR Policy: per-SL reverse I am missing something.  In what context is it important to say tha

Re: [spring] SR Policy: per-SL reverse

2021-11-15 Thread Greg Mirsky
topic. I tend to agree with Cheng that we > should sync this with PCE/IDR/SPRING/etc. > > Thanks, > Mike. > > -Original Message- > From: Joel M. Halpern > Sent: Friday, November 12, 2021 10:53 PM > To: Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) ; SPRING WG < > spring@ietf.org> &

Re: [spring] SR Policy: per-SL reverse

2021-11-15 Thread Joel M. Halpern
that we should sync this with PCE/IDR/SPRING/etc. Thanks, Mike. -Original Message- From: Joel M. Halpern Sent: Friday, November 12, 2021 10:53 PM To: Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) ; SPRING WG Cc: Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) ; Chengli (Cheng Li) Subject: Re: [spring] SR Policy: per-SL rever

Re: [spring] SR Policy: per-SL reverse

2021-11-15 Thread Mike Koldychev (mkoldych)
rn Sent: Friday, November 12, 2021 10:53 PM To: Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) ; SPRING WG Cc: Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) ; Chengli (Cheng Li) Subject: Re: [spring] SR Policy: per-SL reverse I am missing something. In what context is it important to say that policy 2 is intended to represent the reverse

Re: [spring] SR Policy: per-SL reverse

2021-11-14 Thread Chengli (Cheng Li)
@dmarc.ietf.org Cc: Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) ; SPRING WG ; Chengli (Cheng Li) Subject: Re: [spring] SR Policy: per-SL reverse Hi Mike, You are right that the SR Policy architecture draft does not talk about reverse SLs. But it also doesn't talk about bidirectional paths or aspects like the us

Re: [spring] SR Policy: per-SL reverse

2021-11-12 Thread Joel M. Halpern
I am missing something. In what context is it important to say that policy 2 is intended to represent the reverse of policy 1? Yours, Joel On 11/12/2021 9:09 PM, Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) wrote: Hi SPRING WG, During the PCE session there was a presentation about signaling per-SL (Segment Li

Re: [spring] SR Policy: per-SL reverse

2021-11-12 Thread Ketan Talaulikar
Hi Mike, You are right that the SR Policy architecture draft does not talk about reverse SLs. But it also doesn't talk about bidirectional paths or aspects like the use of association objects for disjoint paths. At one point in time, some of us (WG members) were of the view that these aspects may

[spring] SR Policy: per-SL reverse

2021-11-12 Thread Mike Koldychev (mkoldych)
Hi SPRING WG, During the PCE session there was a presentation about signaling per-SL (Segment List) reverse paths, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-multipath-03#section-4.5. I received comments to bring this up in the SPRING WG. In the simplest case, you have two SR Pol