Hi Yao,
Thanks for your response. I don't see the need for the types L and Q. The
controller might as well use existing types if it is not sure of the
resolution.
Thanks,
Ketan
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 6:57 AM wrote:
> Hi Ketan,
> Thanks for your further comments and explanation. Please see inl
Hi Ketan,
Thanks for your further comments and explanation. Please see inline YAO>.
Regards,
Yao
--原始邮件--
发件人：KetanTalaulikar
抄送人：SPRING WG;i...@ietf.org;
日 期 ：2022年04月05日 00:47
主 题 ：Re: SID Related Algorithm in draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr
Hi Yao,
Hi Yao,
Please check inline below.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 2:34 PM wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We presented
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr
> on IDR's session last week.
> This document defines two kinds of new Segment Sub-TLVs to carry SID
> related al
Hi all,
We presented
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr
on IDR's session last week.
This document defines two kinds of new Segment Sub-TLVs to carry SID related
algorithm when delivering SR Policy via BGP. One is for SR-MPLS adjacency with
algorith
