Hi Alvaro,
Thank you for your comments and suggestions, version-06 has been updated
to include an explanation for the updated RFC:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lin-idr-sr-epe-over-l2bundle/06/
1. Before the update to RFC9085: [RFC9085] does not specify the support of
BGP E
Hi!
If you want to formally update other RFCs, you need to do several other
things: include a tag in the header, indicate the update in the Abstract
and Introduction, and indicate what are the text changes (if any) to the
original RFCs.
While I still think the (formal) update is not needed, it ma
Hi Alvaro,
Thank you for the review and comments.
1.Regarding 3.1:
RFC9086 defines the BGP EPE advertisement for BGP-LS, including the PeerAdj SID
(Type-1102) for L3 link.
RFC9085 in section 2.2 defines the Adjacency SID TLV (Type-1099), LAN Adjacency
SID TLV, and the L2 Bundle Member Attribut
[spring-chair hat off + idr]
Hi!
I took a quick look at the draft -- it uses existing TLVs to convey the
information, which is good.
Given that (IIRC) BGP-LS does not limit TLVs' use as sub-TLVs, rfc9085
already contemplates using the Adjacency SID TLV (as a sub-TLV), and
rfc9086 already says th
