uot;only" 48 bits of ARG)
Thanks & cheers,
--Bruno
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Balázs Varga A
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2024 12:02 PM
> To: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET ; Joel Halpern
> ; draft-varga-spring-preof-...@ietf.org
> Cc: SPRING WG
> Subjec
Hi Bruno,
Many thanks for your thoughts. Yes, in draft-varga-spring-preof-sid, it's a
design choice to include
the Sequence Number in the IPv6 destination address. I agree, that its impacts
have to be discussed
more detailed in the draft's future updates.
1, ECMP hashing
There is one more very
Joel, authors,
[speaking as individual contributor for this whole email thread]
> From: Joel Halpern
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2024 7:19 PM
>
> As I understand it, as a participant, regarding your point 1, detnet
> prohibits ECMP within detnet domains. (If you mean some other form of load
Hi Bala'zs,
Thanks for your answer.
Eventually, point 1 could be added in the spring draft as this Detnet
restriction may not be obvious for SPRING reviewers.
Thanks & cheers,
--Bruno
-Original Message-
From: Balázs Varga A
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2024 8:48 PM
To: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/
Hi Bruno,
Many thanks for your readthrough.
1, DetNet uses three toolsets (i) Resource allocation, (ii) Service protection,
and (iii) Explicit routes.
ECMP is not allowed within DetNet. As You wrote, a single forwarding path can
be used through
an SR-Policy.
2, Yes, we are open regarding names,
As I understand it, as a participant, regarding your point 1, detnet
prohibits ECMP within detnet domains. (If you mean some other form of
load balancing, can you be more specific.)
Yours,
Joel
On 7/23/2024 11:52 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
[speaking as individual contributor]
Hi
