Hi, Bruno.
Thanks for the reply.
Please refer to the inline [Nat3].
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 5:36 PM wrote:
> Hi Nat,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your reply and clarifications.
>
> Please see inline [Bruno3]
>
>
>
> *From:* Nat Kao
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 6, 2025 3:48 AM
>
> Hi, Bruno.
>
> Many thanks
Hi,
Question (previously it was more of an observation :).
Draft says:
If the same Aggregation segment is advertised by multiple nodes, it
becomes an anycast segment. Absent specific provisions (e.g.,
context specific label) such anycast segment needs to advertise the
same labels re
HI,
I would just highlight that this draft enhances the scalability of the
control plane and data plane of SR-MPLS networks by introducing a new level
of hierarchy/indirection. That is achieved by prefix and label aggregation
by ABRs.
On the other hand as there is no free lunch it removes the ato
Hi Bruno,
Do you mean « UPA is not enough” or “Hint” is not enough.
>
> Assuming the later, we can’t force people to use UPA, plus IP aggregation
> existed before UPA.
>
> But we can rephrase to first express the drawback of aggregation (loss of
> individual reachability) and then refers to a solu
Hi,
From: Robert Raszuk
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 4:11 PM
HI,
I would just highlight that this draft enhances the scalability of the control
plane and data plane of SR-MPLS networks by introducing a new level of
hierarchy/indirection. That is achieved by prefix and label aggregation by AB
Hi Robert,
Please see inline [Bruno]
From: Robert Raszuk
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 11:10 AM
To: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET
Cc: SPRING WG ;
draft-decraene-spring-sr-mpls-aggregation-segm...@ietf.org
Hi,
Question (previously it was more of an observation :).
Draft says:
If the same Aggr
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the review and comments.
Please see inline [Bruno]
From: Robert Raszuk
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 10:38 AM
To: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET
Hi,
Very nice !
But is there a reason why this approach would not work for vanilla LDP ?
If ABRs can aggregate MPLS labels and gen
Hi,
Very nice !
But is there a reason why this approach would not work for vanilla LDP ?
If ABRs can aggregate MPLS labels and generate aggregate SID they could as
well generate aggregate FECs.
And we do have for years the ability to use LPM for MPLS too.
Of course perhaps folks are moving away
Hi Nat,
Thanks for your reply and clarifications.
Please see inline [Bruno3]
From: Nat Kao
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 3:48 AM
Hi, Bruno.
Many thanks for the reply.
Please refer to the inline[Nat2]:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 10:45 PM
mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>> wrote:
Hi Nat,
Thanks fo
Hi, Bruno.
Many thanks for the reply.
Please refer to the inline[Nat2]:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 10:45 PM wrote:
> Hi Nat,
>
Thanks for your reply.
>
> I have one clarification question. Please see inline [Bruno2]
>
>
>
> *From:* Nat Kao
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 5, 2025 4:53 AM
> *To:* DECRAEN
Hi Nat,
Thanks for your reply.
I have one clarification question. Please see inline [Bruno2]
From: Nat Kao
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 4:53 AM
To: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET
Cc: SPRING WG ;
draft-decraene-spring-sr-mpls-aggregation-segm...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-decraene-spring-s
Hi, Bruno.
Thanks for the reply.
Please refer to the inline [Nat].
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 9:37 PM wrote:
> Hi Nat,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your review and the very good questions.
>
>
>
> Please see inline [Bruno]
>
>
>
> *From:* Nat Kao
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 4, 2025 10:59 AM
> *To:* DECRAENE Br
Hi Nat,
Thanks for your review and the very good questions.
Please see inline [Bruno]
From: Nat Kao
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 10:59 AM
To: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET
Cc: SPRING WG ;
draft-decraene-spring-sr-mpls-aggregation-segm...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-decraene-spring-sr-mpls
Hi, Bruno.
Thanks for the draft. It's helpful to aggregate SIDs based on prefixes in
an SR-MPLS network.
I have a few questions regarding this draft:
-In section 5, should the signaling direction be in the reversing order?
(I may have missed something here)
Ex: in section 5.1:
-For the aggreg
14 matches
Mail list logo
