Hi Liyan,
Many thanks for your review of the document. Please see replies inline with
On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 4:53 AM Liyan Gong wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This draft comprehensively details procedures for leveraging the STAMP to
> measure performance in Segment Routing networks (SR-MPLS/SRv6). E
Hi Zhenqiang,
Thank you for your review of the draft.
Please see replies inline tagged with ..
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 11:39 PM lizhenqi...@chinamobile.com <
lizhenqi...@chinamobile.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have read this version. It is useful for operators when they use STAMP
> in segmen
Hi All,
This draft comprehensively details procedures for leveraging the STAMP to
measure performance in Segment Routing networks (SR-MPLS/SRv6). Especially, the
new extension of STAMP to support new modes (one-way, loopback, and
timestamp-and-forward) significantly enhances scalability and pra
Hello Alvaro,
Thank you very much for your prompt response and clearificaiton.
Regards,
Zhenqiang Li
China Mobile
lizhenqi...@chinamobile.com
From: Alvaro Retana
Date: 2025-05-29 22:24
To: lizhenqi...@chinamobile.com
CC: draft-ietf-spring-stamp-srpm.all; spring
Subject: Re: [spring] I-D Actio
On May 28, 2025 at 11:39:44 PM, lizhenqi...@chinamobile.com wrote:
Zhenqiang:
Hi!
I'm responding to your first point from the process and documentation
requirement perspective — the same answer applies to any new behavior.
> 1. This doc is informational. I do not think it is appropriate to d
Hello all,
I have read this version. It is useful for operators when they use STAMP in
segment routing networks. The following comments are for the authors'
considerations.
1. This doc is informational. I do not think it is appropriate to define a new
SID behavior, END.TSF, in an informational
