[spring] Re: [pim] Re: wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping

2024-07-11 Thread Gunter van de Velde (Nokia)
for this draft. Brgds, G/ -Original Message- From: Loa Andersson Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 2:34 PM To: Alvaro Retana ; Michael McBride ; Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia) ; p...@ietf.org Cc: spring@ietf.org Subject: [spring] Re: [pim] Re: wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping CAUTION: This

[spring] Re: [pim] Re: wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping

2024-07-10 Thread Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia)
Hi Loa Thank you! Noted! Hooman -Original Message- From: Loa Andersson Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 8:34 AM To: Alvaro Retana ; Michael McBride ; Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia) ; p...@ietf.org Cc: spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] Re: [pim] Re: wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping

[spring] Re: [pim] Re: wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping

2024-07-10 Thread Loa Andersson
ot; -Original Message- From: Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia) Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 6:15 PM To: Alvaro Retana ; Michael McBride ; p...@ietf.org Cc: spring@ietf.org Subject: [spring] Re: [pim] Re: wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping Hi Alvaro I am all for better text to make it more cla

[spring] Re: [pim] Re: wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping

2024-07-10 Thread Alvaro Retana
cy should follow RFC 6425 common procedures for P2MP MPLS LSPs." -Original Message- From: Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia) Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 6:15 PM To: Alvaro Retana ; Michael McBride < michael.mcbr...@futurewei.com>; p...@ietf.org Cc: spring@ietf.org Subject: [spring] Re: [pim]

[spring] Re: [pim] Re: wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping

2024-07-09 Thread Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia)
nal Message- From: Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia) Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 6:15 PM To: Alvaro Retana ; Michael McBride ; p...@ietf.org Cc: spring@ietf.org Subject: [spring] Re: [pim] Re: wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping Hi Alvaro I am all for better text to make it more clarify, but then I ne

[spring] Re: [pim] Re: wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping

2024-07-09 Thread Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia)
Hi Alvaro I am all for better text to make it more clarify, but then I need to copy paste from rfc6425 into this draft. This is how we implemented the P2MP Policy ping 1. we used procedures from RFC6425 for mLDP. In short we went through RFC 6425 and any procedure for mLDP we implemented

[spring] Re: [pim] Re: wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping

2024-07-09 Thread Alvaro Retana
On June 24, 2024 at 11:59:13 PM, Hooman Bidgoli wrote: Hooman: Hi!  Sorry it took me so long to get back. ... > > My main concern is that there is no specification contained in the > > document. Instead, this sentence appears in §3.1: "This draft reuses most > > procedures for mLDP in RFC [RFC64

[spring] Re: [pim] Re: wglc: draft-ietf-pim-p2mp-policy-ping

2024-06-24 Thread Hooman Bidgoli (Nokia)
Hi Alvaro Sorry I completely missed this email until I saw Mike’s email today pointing to this email I uploaded version 7 of the draft so you can see the changes. Please go through the response below and provide feedback as you see fit. Inline HB> Thanks Hooman From: Alvaro Retana Sent: We