> No, we're not talking about "conceptual" decapsulation.
Well if you want to take what has been said here to 6man after holidays no
one will stop you there.
But let's keep in mind that a lot of forwarding engines takes input from
various sources and generate a complete outbound rewrite of the pa
.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Pablo.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brian E Carpenter
> > Date: Saturday, 14 December 2019 at 21:04
> > To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" ,
> "spring@ietf.org"
On 20-Dec-19 22:18, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Right, but the language in the PSP sub-section does not talk about
> decapsulation.
>
>
> Sure as in a way there is no decapsulation there. This is Segment N-1 node
> not Final Segment End node.
If there is no decapsulation and the
Inline.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Brian E Carpenter
Date: Thursday, 19 December 2019 at 22:39
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" , "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [spring] I-D Action:
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt
Sorry, I am still c
On 19/12/19 20:44, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 20-Dec-19 12:01, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>>> And where is it forwarded to, since we are already at the DA?
>>
>> PSP operates at the n-1 segment end of the SR path so naturally after
>> swapping DA it is forwarded to the segment end. Note that we ar
Hi Brian,
Right, but the language in the PSP sub-section does not talk about
> decapsulation.
Sure as in a way there is no decapsulation there. This is Segment N-1 node
not Final Segment End node.
Of course the other way to look at this would be to conceptually describe
this as decapsulation at
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:22 AM Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:45 PM Brian E Carpenter <
> brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 20-Dec-19 12:01, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>> >> And where is it forwarded to, since we are already at the DA?
>> >
>> > PSP operates at the n-1
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:45 PM Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20-Dec-19 12:01, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> >> And where is it forwarded to, since we are already at the DA?
> >
> > PSP operates at the n-1 segment end of the SR path so naturally after
> swapping DA it is
On 20-Dec-19 12:01, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>> And where is it forwarded to, since we are already at the DA?
>
> PSP operates at the n-1 segment end of the SR path so naturally after
> swapping DA it is forwarded to the segment end. Note that we are all along
> operating on the encapsulated heade
Hi Joel,
Yes I do not see why things would not work if original SRC would insert SRH
and PSP would happen leaving original DA to forward. Case of no encap.
I was more responding to Brian's question "Where are we forwarding if we
are at DA" ... that very DA was the encapsulated one I presume.
Bu
Robert, you say we are operating on the encapsulating header.
Do things still work right for the case that the authors felt was
important in the SRH document where the source and destination hosts are
inside the SR Domain, and therefore there is only one IPv6 header? (I
would not be surprised
> And where is it forwarded to, since we are already at the DA?
PSP operates at the n-1 segment end of the SR path so naturally after
swapping DA it is forwarded to the segment end. Note that we are all along
operating on the encapsulated header ... original packet including its
original IPv6 he
;Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" , "spring@ietf.org"
>
> Subject: Re: [spring] I-D Action:
> draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt
>
> Hi Pablo,
>
> See in line:
>
> On 14-Dec-19 22:34, Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) wrote:
> >
Brian,
Inline.
Thank you,
Pablo.
-Original Message-
From: Brian E Carpenter
Date: Saturday, 14 December 2019 at 21:04
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" , "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [spring] I-D Action:
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt
Hi
r
>
> Date: Wednesday, 11 December 2019 at 23:06
> To: "spring@ietf.org"
> Subject: Re: [spring] I-D Action:
> draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt
>
> So, I've tried to look at this with fresh eyes, and thanks for the
> various upd
Brian,
Many thanks for having another look to the draft. Please see inline [PC].
Thank you,
Pablo.
-Original Message-
From: spring on behalf of Brian E Carpenter
Date: Wednesday, 11 December 2019 at 23:06
To: "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [spring] I-D Action:
draft-i
So, I've tried to look at this with fresh eyes, and thanks for the
various updates and clarifications.
(I'm still not on the SPRING list so please leave me in CC.)
I remain a bit puzzled. First, a quote from the SRH specification
(draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-26):
> 4.2. Transit Node
.
-Original Message-
From: spring on behalf of "internet-dra...@ietf.org"
Reply to: "spring@ietf.org"
Date: Wednesday, 11 December 2019 at 20:55
To: "i-d-annou...@ietf.org"
Cc: "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-ne
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking WG of the
IETF.
Title : SRv6 Network Programming
Authors : Clarence Filsfils
Pablo Cam
19 matches
Mail list logo
