Thank you, Alvaro.
We will address other comments in later versions.
Best Regards,
Shuping
发件人: Alvaro Retana
发送时间: 2024年9月13日 20:23
收件人: Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) ;
draft-peng-spring-pmtu-sr-pol...@ietf.org
抄送: SPRING WG
主题: Re: Updates made on draft-ietf-spring-pmtu-sr-policy-01 RE: Chair
Hi Yisong , WG,
I've reviewed your document, and the two issues mentioned are indeed very
common.
These problems are inevitable when transitioning from MPLS to SRv6
deployment. The document provides an excellent solution for addressing
these challenges.
During our actual deployment, we enc
Hi Greg,
The reasons have been listed in Introduction section.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-09#name-introduction
An SRv6 path could be identified by the content of a segment list. However, the
segment list is not be a good key identifier, since the l
Hi Jie,
In the terms section, we have listed
SR path: A path described by a segment list [RFC9545].
SRv6 path: A path described by an SRv6 segment list.
In section 3, you also can find some explanation.
In other words, a SRv6 PSID can be used for a segment list, or multiple segment
lists, or
Hi Shuping!
I looked at the diffs and the changes look good to me.
Thanks for addressing my comments.
Alvaro.
On September 12, 2024 at 9:56:11 PM, Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) (
pengshup...@huawei.com) wrote:
Hi Alvaro, folks,
Many thanks to the Chair's such thorough reviews!
Please find in lin
