Hi Cheng,
The new version looks good to me.
Yao
Original
From: ChengLi
To: spring@ietf.org ;bruno.decra...@orange.com
;zehua...@foxmail.com
;刘尧00165286;Joel Halpern ;
Date: 2024年09月10日 01:15
Subject: RE: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-10.txt
Hi Bruno, Zehua, Ya
Thanks for you quick confirmation!
Bonne soiree!
Cheng
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Farrel
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2024 7:28 PM
To: Cheng Li ; spring@ietf.org; bruno.decra...@orange.com;
zehua...@foxmail.com; liu.ya...@zte.com.cn; 'Joel Halpern'
Subject: RE: [spring] Re: I-D
Thanks Cheng.
I skimmed the Diff and I think you addressed all my point.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Cheng Li
Sent: 09 September 2024 18:15
To: spring@ietf.org; bruno.decra...@orange.com; zehua...@foxmail.com;
liu.ya...@zte.com.cn; Joel Halpern
Subject: [spring] Re: I-D Action: draf
Hi Bruno, Zehua, Yao, Joel, Adrian,
We have updated the draft according to your valuable comments recently. Please
check if your comments are addressed.
1. added IANA section of P-flag and removed P-flag in the figure 3. [Bruno:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/GF-l7Njzt9GzuYgjDN7Xm
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-10.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking (SPRING) WG of the
IETF.
Title: Path Segment for SRv6 (Segment Routing in IPv6)
Authors: Cheng Li
Weiqiang Cheng
Mach(Guoyi) Chen
LGTM — Thanks!
When Ketan tells is we’re ready to move forward I’ll do a deeper read of
the document.
Alvaro.
On September 9, 2024 at 10:44:22 AM, Greg Mirsky (gregimir...@gmail.com)
wrote:
Hi Alvaro,
thank you for your thoughtful and helpful suggestions. Please find my notes
below tagged GIM>
Hi Alvaro,
thank you for your thoughtful and helpful suggestions. Please find my notes
below tagged GIM>>. I've included the diff to highlight the updates applied
in the new working version (somehow, idnits missed another outdated
reference).
Regards,
Greg
On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 2:05 PM Alvaro Re
Hi Cheng,
Thank you for your expedient response. I need to find more reason for the
definition of SRv6 Path Segment because, as I understand it, SRH, by its
nature, provides sufficient identification of the segment list traversed by
the particular SR Policy. And that is fundamentally different from
Hi WG,
I have reviewed the draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment. In my view,
Path Segment provides a useful SRv6 segment for operators.
Best regards,
Shengnan Yue
___
spring mailing list -- spring@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an
BTW, you need to download the file to see the html page in your browser.
This link shows the source code of the HTML file. Just let you know.
Thanks,
Cheng
From: Cheng Li
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2024 10:26 AM
To: zehua...@foxmail.com
Cc: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Re: Request for MORE
Thank you Zehua, we will add the text in the next revision.
Please see the diff here,
https://github.com/muzixing/SRv6-Path-Segment/blob/main/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-path-segment-10.diff%20(1).html.
Thank you so much for your help!
Cheng
From: zehua...@foxmail.com
Sent: Monday, September 9, 20
Hi, Cheng:
1) I think adding this text would be helpful for understanding.
2) Yeah, I think path segment may have more interesting use cases when
considering intermediate nodes, which can be further explored in future
discussions.
Best,
Zehua
From: Cheng Li
Date: 2024-09-06 00:00
To: zehua...
12 matches
Mail list logo
