[spring] [Errata Verified] RFC8402 (7671)

The following errata report has been verified for RFC8402, "Segment Routing Architecture". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7671 -- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by

[spring] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8402 (7671)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8402, "Segment Routing Architecture". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7671 -- Type: Editorial Reported by: Alvaro Retana

Re: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-15.txt

I guess you meant 'SR packets' instead of SR Path? So it will be "It is worthy to note that in case of ECMP, with or without the use of EL, the SR packets may be forwarded over multiple paths. In this case, the SID list cannot directly reflect the actual forwarding path and the PSID can only

Re: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-15.txt

NEW: It is worthy to note that in case of ECMP, with or without the use of EL, the SR Path may be forwarded over multiple paths. In this case, the SID list cannot directly reflect the actual forwarding path and the PSID can only identify the SID list rather than the actual forwarding path. This

Re: [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-15.txt

Hi Cheng, Thanks for your reply. Please see inline [Bruno] > > From: Cheng Li > Sent: Friday, October 6, 2023 12:07 PM > > Hi Bruno, > > Please see my reply inline. I provide some text to address your comments, any > suggested text is appreciated > > Thanks, > Cheng > > Orange Restricted > --

Re: [spring] SRV6 for EVPN Fast Reroute

Hi Luc, Theirs is another way of achieving the same thing - using the behavior vs. using the flag. The draft link: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-bess-multihome-srv6-service-sid-flag/ Each egress PE advertises an additional SRv6 Service SID in BGP routes which is called No-Further-

Re: [spring] AD review draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-15

Hi Jim, Many thanks for your review, authors will provide an update to address your comments and get back to you soon. Thanks, Cheng From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard Sent: Monday, October 9, 2023 4:47 PM To: draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segm...@ietf.org Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org; SPRI

[spring] AD review draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-15

Dear Authors, Please find my review below of draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-15. I have used idnit on this version so that you can see the line numbers for my comments. ## 24 In SR for MPLS data plane (SR-MPLS), an Egress node can not determine Jim> replace 'can not'