Hi all,
We have submitted a new revision of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming.
This update only changes the references section of the draft. Particularly
- Corrected Ethernet reference to IEEE 802.3
- RFC6437 moved from informative to normative
- Updated draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-h
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, 04:39 Sander Steffann, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > How this relates to NETPGM
> > - SRv6 SIDs are IPv6 addresses.
> > - SRv6 SIDs are not necessarily interface addresses.
>
> This will need some work, because according to
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#section-2.1: "IPv6 addres
The changes in section 4.16.1 do improve the clarity.
Having said that, the text about motivating PSP reads:
PSP allows, for example, for an egress PE to receive a packet
with a segment in the DA of the outer header without any need to
process the SRH.
is a very weak and confusing exp
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking WG of the
IETF.
Title : SRv6 Network Programming
Authors : Clarence Filsfils
Pablo Cam
Hi Joel,
Please check revision 13 of this document that clarifies the PSP section.
About your last point:
For both SR-MPLS and SRv6, there are restrictions on the path to be used, in
particular:
- the SR policy may only use SIDs instantiated on SR Endpoints.
- When computing the SR policy, there
Darren, I had assumed that 8754 did indeed define things the way you use
them. However, I can not find the assertions you make.
The short text in section 3.3 of RFC 6754 does not seem to create a
distinction between segment or local interface. For that to be the
justification for SIDs do not
Hi,
> How this relates to NETPGM
> - SRv6 SIDs are IPv6 addresses.
> - SRv6 SIDs are not necessarily interface addresses.
This will need some work, because according to
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#section-2.1: "IPv6 addresses of all types
are assigned to interfaces, not nodes.". I think
The following are some observations on SRv6 SIDs and IPv6 addressing as they
pertain to draft-ietf-spring-network-programming (NETPGM)
SRv6 RFCs tell us the following as it relates to SRv6 SIDs, IPv6 addresses and
how SIDs are identified and assigned:
- RFC8402 tells us an SRv6 SID is an IPv6 ad
Hi Bruno,
Thank you. Both proposed changes look good to me.
I will also update draft-ietf-6man-SRH... to RFC8754.
Cheers,
Pablo.
From: "bruno.decra...@orange.com"
Date: Friday, 13 March 2020 at 17:27
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" , "spring@ietf.org"
Subject: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-
